Sure. I will do it.

Thanks,
Sorabh

On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:35 AM Arina Yelchiyeva <arina.yelchiy...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Sure, we can discuss it during Hangout.
> Sorabh, since you are latest release manager, I am wondering if you would
> volunteer to add scripts into Drill project? :)
> At least something to start with.
>
> Kind regards,
> Arina
>
> > On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:32 PM, SorabhApache <sor...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > +1 for including release scripts. I would also recommend adding a
> README.md
> > in the same location, which can include link to a wiki for the release
> > process or all the instructions in it. Also it would be great if we can
> > formulate some guidelines as to what kind of issues may not be considered
> > as blocker for a release going forward. May be we can discuss in the next
> > hangout as well.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sorabh
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 8:03 AM Aman Sinha <amansi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> +1 on including the release preparation script into the code base.
> Location
> >> TBD.  Perhaps under a separate 'release' subdirectory either in contrib
> or
> >> docs ?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 12:46 AM Arina Yelchiyeva <
> >> arina.yelchiy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Maybe we should include these scripts directly into Drill project (of
> >>> course if Parth does not mind), maybe in doc module?
> >>> This way we will be able to modify them if needed using regular PR
> >> process
> >>> and everybody will know where to find them.
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> Kind regards,
> >>> Arina
> >>>
> >>>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 1:56 AM, SorabhApache <sor...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Update:
> >>>> DRILL-7201 / DRILL-7202: Kunal has fixes for both and are
> >>> ready-to-commit.
> >>>> DRILL-7213: drill-format-mapr.jar contains stale git.properties file
> >>>>
> >>>>  - The main issue here was that in 1.14 and 1.15 drill-format-mapr.jar
> >>>>  was included with release tarballs where it shouldn't be. So Vova
> >>> helped to
> >>>>  make a change in 1.16 to fix that and now format-mapr will not be
> >>> included
> >>>>  in release tarballs, not any mapr specific jars. The PR is approved
> >> and
> >>>>  ready-to-commit.
> >>>>
> >>>> DRILL-7212: Add gpg key with apache.org email for sorabh
> >>>>
> >>>>  - PR is opened for it. I have added both my emails to the gpg key and
> >>> is
> >>>>  signed by boaz.
> >>>>
> >>>> DRILL-7207: Update the copyright year in NOTICE.txt file
> >>>>
> >>>>  - PR is opened for this as well.
> >>>>
> >>>> Last issue which Vova reported about files like
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler1256088670033285178arguments*
> >>>> being included in jar. This was present in 1.14 as well but not in
> >> 1.15.
> >>>> The reason is it looks like different processes are followed for
> >> release.
> >>>> Every release done using the script (drill-release.sh)[1] will have
> >> above
> >>>> file. The reason is because the *mvn release:prepare* phase is done
> >> with
> >>> -X
> >>>> flag which creates debug files and those are not excluded from
> >> maven-jar
> >>>> plugin configuration. After removing the -X option I am not seeing
> >> above
> >>>> files anymore and speed of prepare phase is increased significantly as
> >>>> well. Will submit a separate PR for this change in script post
> release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Once all the changes are merged into master, I will re-prepare the RC
> >>>> candidate and share with the community.
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]: https://github.com/parthchandra/stuff/tree/master/scripts
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Sorabh
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 3:02 PM Kunal Khatua <ku...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> UPDATE:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Both, DRILL-7201 and DRILL-7202 has been fixed and verified by Sorabh
> >>>>> and Arina, so we can have it as part of "RC2".
> >>>>>
> >>>>> (Thanks for catching the issues, Arina ! )
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ~ kunal
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 4/25/2019 4:12:16 AM, Volodymyr Vysotskyi <volody...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Sorabh,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have noticed that jars in prebuild tar contain some strange files,
> >> for
> >>>>> example, *drill-jdbc-all-1.16.0.jar* contains the following files:
> >>>>> *javac.sh*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler1256088670033285178arguments*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler1458111453480208588arguments*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler2392560589194600493arguments*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler4475905192586529595arguments*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler4524532450095901144arguments*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler4670895443631397937arguments*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler5215058338087807885arguments*
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> *org.codehaus.plexus.compiler.javac.JavacCompiler7526103232425779297arguments*
> >>>>>
> >>>>> which contain some info about your machine (username, etc.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jars from the previous release didn't contain these files. Also, I
> >> have
> >>>>> built master on my machine and these files are absent for me.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Could you please take a look? This problem is observed for both RCs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 8:20 AM SorabhApache wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Update:
> >>>>>> 1) DRILL-7208 is there in 1.15 release as well, so it's not a
> blocker
> >>> for
> >>>>>> 1.16
> >>>>>> 2) DRILL-7213: drill-format-mapr.jar contains stale git.properties
> >> file
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Still investigating on the above issue.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 3) DRILL-7201: Strange symbols in error window (Windows)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Issue is not reproducible on Kunal's machine. He is having
> >> discussion
> >>>>>> on JIRA to see if it's treated as a blocker or not.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To investigate for DRILL-7213 I have to drop the RC1 candidate since
> >>>>> again
> >>>>>> performing the release required to push it to my remote repo and
> >>> publish
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>> maven repo as well. So I don't have RC1 binaries if we consider all
> >> the
> >>>>>> issues as non-blocking.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I will re-share the RC candidate once either fix for
> >>>>> DRILL-7213/DRILL-7201
> >>>>>> are available or it's considered as non-blockers. Any thoughts?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>> Sorabh
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:17 PM Boaz Ben-Zvi wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Downloaded both the binary and src tarballs, and verified the SHA
> >>>>>>> signatures and the PGP.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Built and ran the full unit tests on both Linux and Mac (took 3:05
> >>>>> hours
> >>>>>>> on my Mac).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Successfully ran some old favorite queries with
> >>> Sort/Hash-Join/Hash-Agg
> >>>>>>> spilling.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Ran several manual tests of REFRESH METADATA with COLUMNS, and
> >>> verified
> >>>>>>> the metadata files and summaries.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Noticed that when specifying a COLUMN which a sub-field in a
> complex
> >>>>>>> type (e.g., a key in a map), the whole column (i.e. all the other
> >> keys
> >>>>>>> as well) was marked as "interesting"; but this may be "by design",
> >> as
> >>>>>>> the refresh granularity is the whole column.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Also noticed the sys.version issue (DRILL-7208
> >>>>>>> ) - should be minor as
> >>>>>>> only affecting users of the SRC tarball, likely developers who
> >>>>>>> build/modify the code anyway.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hence my vote is +1 .
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> -- Boaz
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 4/24/19 10:57 AM, Kunal Khatua wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Downloaded the tarball and tried it in embedded mode.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ran simple join queries and interacted with the WebUI.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Issues confirmed were DRILL-7192 and DRILL-7203.
> >>>>>>>> I'm unable to repro DRILL-7201 and DRILL-7202, though I have a fix
> >>>>> for
> >>>>>>> the latter. Will work with Arina to identify repro steps.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> None of these are blockers IMO, so I'll vote +1.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ~ Kunal
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 4/24/2019 10:38:31 AM, Khurram Faraaz wrote:
> >>>>>>>> i see the correct version and commit, I deployed the binaries to
> >>>>> test.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Apache Drill 1.16.0
> >>>>>>>> "Start your SQL engine."
> >>>>>>>> apache drill> select * from sys.version;
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
> >>>>>>>> | version | commit_id |
> >>>>>>>> commit_message | commit_time |
> >>>>>>>> build_email | build_time |
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
> >>>>>>>> | 1.16.0 | cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53 |
> >>>>>>>> [maven-release-plugin] prepare release drill-1.16.0 | 22.04.2019 @
> >>>>>>> 09:08:36
> >>>>>>>> PDT | sor...@apache.org | 22.04.2019 @ 09:53:25 PDT |
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
> >>>>>>>> 1 row selected (0.274 seconds)
> >>>>>>>> apache drill>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>> Khurram
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:52 AM SorabhApache wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Volodymyr/Anton,
> >>>>>>>>> I can verify that I am seeing both the below issues as reported
> by
> >>>>>> Anton
> >>>>>>>>> and Volodymyr. I will investigate further why we are seeing these
> >>>>>>> issues.
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for catching this. Can you please open JIRA's for these
> >>>>> issues
> >>>>>> ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 1) Wrong result for sys.version query when built from source
> >>>>> tarball.
> >>>>>>>>> 2) git.properties file in drill-format-mapr-1.16.0.jar has wrong
> >>>>>> commit
> >>>>>>> id
> >>>>>>>>> but as Volodymyr mentioned because of order in which jars are
> >> picked
> >>>>>> up
> >>>>>>>>> it's not showing the issue when tried from prebuilt tarball.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> @Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >>>>>>>>> Regarding the GPG key I am not sure if we mandate it to use
> >>>>>> apache.org,
> >>>>>>>>> there other keys in the file which are using gmail address as
> >> well.
> >>>>> As
> >>>>>>> far
> >>>>>>>>> as the signing person is authenticating the key and details
> >>>>> associated
> >>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>> it, I think it should be fine. But since it's recommended I will
> >> use
> >>>>>>>>> apache.org email address instead.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>> Sorabh
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 8:53 AM Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Aman,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> There are two different issues connected with *git.properties*
> >>>>> file.
> >>>>>>>>>> Regarding the problem I have mentioned, prebuilt tar
> >>>>>>>>>> (apache-drill-1.16.0.tar.gz) contains
> >>>>> *drill-format-mapr-1.16.0.jar*
> >>>>>>> jar
> >>>>>>>>>> which contains a *git.properties* file with the incorrect
> >> version.
> >>>>>>>>>> When *select * from sys.version* query is submitted, class
> loader
> >>>>>> finds
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> first file named as *git.properties* from the classpath (each
> >> drill
> >>>>>> jar
> >>>>>>>>>> contains its own *git.properties* file) and for my case file
> from
> >>>>>>>>>> *drill-format-mapr-1.16.0.jar *is picked up, so the incorrect
> >>>>> result
> >>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>> returned. But it may not be reproducible for other machines
> since
> >>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>> depends on the order of files for the class loader.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regarding the problem Anton has mentioned, Drill should be built
> >>>>> from
> >>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>> sources (apache-drill-1.16.0-src.tar.gz), and for that version,
> >>>>>>> *select *
> >>>>>>>>>> from sys.version* returns the result without information about
> >>>>>> commit.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 6:33 PM Aman Sinha wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> This works fine for me with the binary tarball that I installed
> >> on
> >>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>> Mac.
> >>>>>>>>>>> ..it shows the correct commit message.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Apache Drill 1.16.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> "This isn't your grandfather's SQL."
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> apache drill> *select* * *from* sys.version;
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
> >>>>>>>>>>> | version | commit_id |
> >>>>>>>>>>> commit_message | commit_time |
> >>>>>>>>>>> build_email | build_time |
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
> >>>>>>>>>>> | 1.16.0 | cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53 |
> >>>>>>>>>>> [maven-release-plugin] prepare release drill-1.16.0 |
> >> 22.04.2019 @
> >>>>>>>>>> 09:08:36
> >>>>>>>>>>> PDT | sor...@apache.org | 22.04.2019 @ 09:54:09 PDT |
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+------------------------------------------+-----------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
> >>>>>>>>>>> I don't see any extraneous git.properties anywhere in the
> source
> >>>>>>>>>>> distribution that I downloaded:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [root@aman1 apache-drill-1.16.0-src]# find . -name
> >>>>> "git.properties"
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> ./distribution/target/apache-drill-1.16.0/apache-drill-1.16.0/git.properties
> >>>>>>>>>>> ./git.properties
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 4:51 AM Arina Ielchiieva
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Taking into account previous emails, looks like we'll need to
> >>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>>>>>> RC.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I also suggest to include
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7201
> >>>>>>>>>>>> into
> >>>>>>>>>>>> new RC.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Arina
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 2:44 PM Volodymyr Vysotskyi <>
> >>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, I have noticed that for the prebuilt tar, the following
> >>>>>> query
> >>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>> my
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> machine returns the wrong results:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> apache drill> select * from sys.version;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> | version | commit_id |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> commit_message | commit_time
> >>>>>>>>>> |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> build_email | build_time |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> | 1.16.0 | b3db1ff4b0d29210593c4485125578cca7a64b42 |
> >>>>> DRILL-7188:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Revert
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-6642: Update protocol-buffers version | 21.04.2019 @
> >>>>>> 15:35:28
> >>>>>>>>>>> PDT |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> sor...@apache.org | 22.04.2019 @ 09:07:35 PDT |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+------------------------------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------+---------------------------+-------------------+---------------------------+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1 row selected (1.318 seconds)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The root cause for this problem is that
> >>>>>>>>> drill-format-mapr-1.16.0.jar
> >>>>>>>>>>> jar
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> contains git.properties file with incorrect version, and this
> >>>>> file
> >>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> first one which was found by the class loader.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think this is a blocker for the release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 2:31 PM Anton Gozhiy
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clarification to my last message:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I downloaded Drill from here:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> http://home.apache.org/~sorabh/drill/releases/1.16.0/rc1/apache-drill-1.16.0-src.tar.gz
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and built it by command:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> mvn clean install -DskipTests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 1:53 PM Anton Gozhiy <>
> >>>>>>>>> anton5...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found an issue with Drill version, used the provided rc1
> >>>>>>>>>> source:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache drill> select * from sys.version;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+-----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+------------+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | version | commit_id | commit_message | commit_time |
> >>>>>>>>>> build_email
> >>>>>>>>>>> |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build_time |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+-----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+------------+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | 1.16.0 | Unknown | | | Unknown
> >>>>>>>>>>> |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> |
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> +---------+-----------+----------------+-------------+-------------+------------+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Although there is a valid git.properties file in the Drill
> >>>>> root
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> directory:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #Generated by Git-Commit-Id-Plugin
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #Mon Apr 22 09:52:07 PDT 2019
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.branch=cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.host=SHamirw-E755.local
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.time=22.04.2019 @ 09\:52\:07 PDT
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.user.email=sor...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.user.name=Sorabh Hamirwasia
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.build.version=1.16.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.closest.tag.commit.count=0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.closest.tag.name=drill-1.16.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.id=cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.id.abbrev=cf5b758
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.id.describe=drill-1.16.0-0-gcf5b758
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.id.describe-short=drill-1.16.0-0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.message.full=[maven-release-plugin] prepare
> >> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> drill-1.16.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.message.short=[maven-release-plugin] prepare
> >>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> drill-1.16.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.time=22.04.2019 @ 09\:08\:36 PDT
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.user.email=sor...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.commit.user.name=Sorabh Hamirwasia
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.dirty=false
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.remote.origin.url=https\://github.com/apache/drill.git
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.tags=drill-1.16.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> git.total.commit.count=3568
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But looks like it doesn't get into the classpath.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could someone take a look into this?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 11:50 AM Volodymyr Vysotskyi <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Sorabh,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry for being picky, but looks like the key you have
> >>>>>>>>> published
> >>>>>>>>>>> was
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generated for non-apache email: sohami.apa...@gmail.com.
> >>>>>>>>>>> According
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1], it is highly recommended to use Apache email address
> >> as
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> primary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> User-ID.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://www.apache.org/dev/release-signing#user-id
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:10 AM Jyothsna Reddy <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> jyothsna....@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Built it from cloning the git branch and unit tests on my
> >>>>>>>>>> Linux
> >>>>>>>>>>> VM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken - 43 min).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tested new features of metadata caching by creating v4
> >> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>> files
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new Refresh Metadata commands and manually verified the
> >>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>> files.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tried
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a few queries that use metadata cache and verified
> >> results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release looks good to me +1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jyothsna
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [image: Mailtrack]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sender
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> notified by
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mailtrack
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://mailtrack.io?utm_source=gmail&utm_medium=signature&utm_campaign=signaturevirality5&;
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 04/24/19,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 12:09:52 AM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:09 AM Jyothsna Reddy <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> jyothsna....@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Built it from cloning the git branch and unit tests on
> my
> >>>>>>>>>>> Linux
> >>>>>>>>>>>> VM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> taken - 43 min).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tested new features of metadata caching by creating v4
> >>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>> files
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> using
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new Refresh Metadata commands and manually verified the
> >>>>>>>>>> cache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> files.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Tried
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a few queries that use metadata cache and verified
> >>>>>>>>> results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did a few manual tests with REFRESH METADATA by creating
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> V4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The release looks good to me +1.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jyothsna
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:56 PM Sorabh Hamirwasia <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shamirwa...@mapr.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Volodymyr,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The KEYS file on svn will be updated when a release
> >>>>>>>>>> candidate
> >>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> approved
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and all the artifacts are copied to the svn.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> NOTICE is not updated per release so I won't treat it
> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>> blocker.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> But
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be good to add it in the wiki below to ensure from next
> >>>>>>>>>> time
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> onwards
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> updated.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For release I am following this wiki[1] which is part
> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Parth's
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository. I will update it to include both the steps
> >>>>>>>>>> above
> >>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> well.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> https://github.com/parthchandra/drill/wiki/Drill-Release-Process
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorabh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 1:19 PM Volodymyr Vysotskyi <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorabh, could you please add your key to the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/drill/KEYS
> >>>>>>>>>>> file?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not sure that it is a blocker, but the year in NOTICE
> >>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2018.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we have any guides for basic checks for release? If
> >>>>>>>>>> no,
> >>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> would be
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to introduce such a list of things to check for the
> >>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manager.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 11:09 PM Aman Sinha <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> amansi...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Downloaded source tarball on my Linux VM and built
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>> ran
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> unit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tests
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> successfully (elapsed time 46 mins).
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Downloaded binary tarball on my Mac and ran in
> >>>>>>>>>> embedded
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> mode.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Verified Sorabh's release signature using gpg
> >>>>>>>>> --verify
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked the maven artifacts are published
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Checked Ran a few queries against TPC-DS SF1 and
> >>>>>>>>>> examined
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> query
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> profiles
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Web UI. Looked good.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Did a few manual tests with REFRESH METADATA by
> >>>>>>>>>> creating
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> V4
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> metadata cache and checked EXPLAIN plans and query
> >>>>>>>>>>> results.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Found an issue with control-c handling and filed
> >>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7198
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> noted in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the JIRA that I don't think it is a blocker.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Overall, release looks good ! +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 10:01 AM SorabhApache <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sor...@apache.org
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks Aman and Volodymyr for discussing on this
> >>>>>>>>>> issue.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clarify
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the thread that RC1 still stands as valid, since
> >>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> issue
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anymore.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 9:18 AM Volodymyr
> >>>>>>>>> Vysotskyi <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Discussed with Aman and concluded that this issue
> >>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blocker
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:39 PM Aman Sinha <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> amansi...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Vova,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added some thoughts in the DRILL-7195 JIRA.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Aman
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 6:06 AM Volodymyr
> >>>>>>>>>>> Vysotskyi <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> volody...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did some checks and found the following
> >>>>>>>>>> issues:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7195 <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7195>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7194 <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7194>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - DRILL-7192 <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-7192>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> One of them (DRILL-7194) is also reproduced
> >>>>>>>>> on
> >>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> previous
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another is connected with the new feature
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> (DRILL-7192),
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that we should treat them as blockers.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The third one (DRILL-7195) is a regression
> >>>>>>>>> and
> >>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> some
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cases
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cause
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrong results, so I think that it should be
> >>>>>>>>>> fixed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Volodymyr Vysotskyi
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 8:58 PM SorabhApache
> >>>>>>>>> <>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sor...@apache.org>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *< please="" disregard="" previous="" email,="">
> >>>>>> one=""
> >>>>>>> of="">
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> link
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> correct
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Use the information in this email instead
> >>>>>>>>>> *
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Drillers,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd like to propose the second release
> >>>>>>>>>>> candidate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (RC1)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Drill,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version 1.16.0.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes since the previous release
> >>>>>>>>> candidate:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7185: Drill Fails to Read Large
> >>>>>>>>> Packets
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7186: Missing storage.json REST
> >>>>>>>>>> endpoint
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7190: Missing backward compatibility
> >>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>> REST
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> API
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-6562
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also below 2 JIRA's were created to
> >>>>>>>>>> separately
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> track
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> revert
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> protbuf
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes in 1.16.0:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7188: Revert DRILL-6642: Update
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> protocol-buffers
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> DRILL-7189: Revert DRILL-7105 Error while
> >>>>>>>>>>>> building
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Drill
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> native
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> client
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RC1 includes total of 215 resolved
> >>>>>>>>> JIRAs
> >>>>>>>>>>> [1].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks to everyone for their hard work to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> contribute
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The tarball artifacts are hosted at [2] and
> >>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> maven
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> artifacts
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hosted
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at [3].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This release candidate is based on commit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cf5b758e0a4c22b75bfb02ac2653ff09415ddf53
> >>>>>>>>>>> located
> >>>>>>>>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4].
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please download and try out the release
> >>>>>>>>>>>> candidate.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote ends at 06:00 PM UTC (11:00 AM
> >>>>>>>>> PDT,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 09:00
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> PM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> EET,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11:30
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PM
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IST),
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apr 25th, 2019
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] +0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [ ] -1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is my vote: +1
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313820&version=12344284
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
> >>>>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~sorabh/drill/releases/1.16.0/rc1/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedrill-1067/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/sohami/drill/commits/drill-1.16.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorabh
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely, Anton Gozhiy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anton5...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sincerely, Anton Gozhiy
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> anton5...@gmail.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
>

Reply via email to