+1 non-binding On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 8:04 PM Abhishek Radhakrishnan < [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 5:01 PM Abhishek Radhakrishnan < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi folks, > > > > To enable GitHub Actions to require approval only the first time, there > > was a prior discussion here: > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/nwkllr7o51mmv6223hbhhlkfr3204gob. > > > > According to the new ASF policy > > <https://infra.apache.org/github-actions-policy.html>, we'll need formal > > consensus: > > > > > > - > >> > >> A link to a mailing list discussion showing a consensus vote by the > >> PMC noting, that they affirm that they will actively monitor their > >> workflows for abuse, and that they will act accordingly if and when > abuse > >> is detected. Failure to carry out such monitoring and addressing of > abuse > >> may result in the workflow settings being switched back to "always > require > >> approval for external contributors". > > > > > > > > This will encourage folks to continue contributing to the druid-operator, > > so that committers don't have to actively approve each workflow run -- > for > > example: > > - https://github.com/apache/druid-operator/pull/24 > > - https://github.com/apache/druid-operator/pull/16 > > > > This means we commit to actively monitor the workflows for abuse and act > > accordingly, which I believe is feasible for us given we have followed a > similar model with > > the apache/druid repository as well. > > > > > > Please reply: > > > > [+1] Yes > > [0] Abstain > > [-1] No > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Abhishek > > >
