+1 to support java8 in a new deploy branch: 2.7.x

We can use the new features of JDK, such as :lambda expression, functional
programming

Yong Zhu <[email protected]> 于2018年6月13日周三 上午11:36写道:

> +1
>
> We are now repackaging dubbo to org.apache[1]. It's convenient to get
> compatible with custom extension and SPI in 1.8
>
> [1]
>
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/769b7f813a46bdbf5ad4046c1037af301dee673317c9c7545161fed3@%3Cdev.dubbo.apache.org%3E
>
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 11:25 AM, 修宇航 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > 1.8 is the latest adjective version of jdk. It makes sth easy in dubbo.
> >
> > 2018-06-13 11:18 GMT+08:00 [email protected] <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > strong +1 for switch to java8
> > >
> > > After we switch to java8, it will be a great stuff if we can apply new
> > > language feature to dubbo project.
> > >
> > > On 2018/06/13 03:09:03, Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > Hi All,
> > > >
> > > > Since java7 has been announced EOL long time before [1], I think we
> > > should
> > > > switch to Java 8. Once it's done, we can start to use FP, streaming
> > API,
> > > > default interface and many other new features introduced since Java
> 8,
> > > and
> > > > make the code cleaner and faster.
> > > >
> > > > But considering Dubbo is widely deployed, and some users may have not
> > > > switched to Java 8 yet, we should keep Java 7 support on branch
> 2.6.x,
> > > but
> > > > we should definitely switch the development activities on master
> branch
> > > and
> > > > fix severe bug only on branch 2.6.x.
> > > >
> > > > What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > -Ian.
> > > >
> > > > 1.
> https://www.infoq.com/news/2015/05/Oracle-Ends-Java-7Public-Updates
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 9:34 AM htynkn <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > hey team,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > What's the supportted java version for dubbo now?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In travis file, I can see it's using java7 and java8. do we have
> > > offical
> > > > > support java9 or even java10?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Yunkun
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to