How about 'NEED-CLOSE' ?

On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 6:38 PM yuhang xiu <[email protected]> wrote:

> I agree.
> But, is '&READY-TO-CLOSE&' too long to use ?  How about a abbreviation like
> &RTC& or sth?
>
> (Sorry about last mail..)
>
> 2018-07-18 18:37 GMT+08:00 yuhang xiu <[email protected]>:
>
> > I agree.
> > But, is '&READY-TO-CLOSE&' too long to use ?  How about a abbreviation
> > like &RTC& or
> >
> > 2018-07-18 18:22 GMT+08:00 Huxing Zhang <[email protected]>:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I just have a new idea!
> >>
> >> For an issue that is ready to be closed, anyone can comment with
> >> special characters, say, &READY-TO-CLOSE&.
> >>
> >> So committers can search the issue with the special characters, and
> >> deal with it.
> >>
> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues?utf8=%E2%
> >> 9C%93&q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+%26READY-TO-CLOSE%26
> >>
> >> In this way, we can encourage users to check the existing issues and
> mark
> >> them.
> >>
> >> How do you think?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 1:56 PM, Huxing Zhang <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Mark Thomas <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >> >> On 10/07/18 07:04, jun liu wrote:
> >> >>> Hi All,
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Now the community has become very active, pull requests and issues
> >> are being reported in a certain amount every day, in contrast, our
> response
> >> seems not fast enough and issues bumped up.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I've thought of a duty table for temporarily solving this problem,
> >> committers on duty are responsible for responding to community
> activities,
> >> classify issues and resolve/assign issues, by doing that, we can
> guarantee
> >> at least some of the committers devote enough time to the community
> every
> >> day.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Remember that we still need to encourage users to participate in any
> >> kind of contribution, and anyone can still participate in the community
> at
> >> any time.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Here’s an example duty form: https://github.com/apache/incu
> >> bator-dubbo/wiki/Duty-Form
> >> >>> Remember label issues: https://github.com/apache/incu
> >> bator-dubbo/wiki/Label-an-Issue
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Do you guys have any ideas of how to achieve this goal?
> >> >>
> >> >> Just remember that every committer is a volunteer and that they get
> to
> >> >> choose what they work on. Allocating committers to tasks isn't
> >> something
> >> >> that happens on an ASF project.
> >> >>
> >> >> Growing the community is the obvious answer to an increasing backlog
> of
> >> >> issues. If you haven't already seen it I strongly recommend reading
> >> this
> >> >> post that talks about Apache Beam's experience in this area:
> >> >>
> >> >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/33a6c3aa0fffa6e961aa2b8
> >> 61ebde333d898a5e1062d0d71d0e13d46@%3Cdev.community.apache.org%3E
> >> >
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I agree that we can not force anyone to do anything in the project.
> >> >
> >> > But we can still discuss how we can clean up this issue faster.
> >> >
> >> > When I was reading the legacy issues recently, I've learned something
> >> > that I would like to share.
> >> >
> >> > 1. Some of the issue are quite similar, these frequently asked
> >> > question can be summarized to the FAQ, and I think the FAQ should be
> >> > improved by anyone. That means the current FAQ should be put to
> >> > somewhere other than Wiki.
> >> > 2. Some of issues are not clearly described, making us hard to
> >> > reproduce, or reported long time ago. For these kind of issues, I
> >> > think simply reply with "Thanks for your question, would you please
> >> > try the latest version? I am going to close this issue now. Feel free
> >> > to reopen it if the problem still exists." and close it will be fine.
> >> > 3. Triage the issue with labels. This make not even committers but
> >> > contributors easily to find. For example, a label of "good start
> >> > issue" or "help wanted" may attract new users to easily jump in and
> >> > help. I've also added to "How can I contribute" in README.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Mark
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Best Regards!
> >> > Huxing
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards!
> >> Huxing
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to