Great. Let's do it. I'll start an issue to track this proposal. On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 5:11 PM G C <cg.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 Deep agree > -- > Best Regards！ > > cgfork > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 4:53 PM yuhang xiu <carry...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Deep agree with this proposal > > :) > > > > Jerrick Zhu <jerr...@apache.org> 于2018年8月17日周五 下午1:39写道： > > > > > I agree with keeping the following modules: > > > * dubbo-registry-multicast, > > > * dubbo-rpc-injvm, > > > * dubbo-serialization-fastjson > > > * dubbo-serialization-jdk > > > > > > They're useful for new users and develop experience. > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 11:10 AM Ian Luo <ian....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > wow, this is a big step but I have somewhat opposite opinion against > > > > Jerrick's proposal. Instead of keeping recommended extensions only > but > > > > moving out others into eco system, I would like to revise it to > keeping > > > > most used extensions, use Jerrick's list as an example: > > > > > > > > * dubbo-registry-multicast <- should keep, it's good for dev > experience > > > > * dubbo-registry-redis <- should move, since not everyone needs this > > > > feature > > > > ... > > > > > > > > * dubbo-remoting-grizzly <- should move, ditto > > > > * dubbo-remoting-p2p <- should move, ditto > > > > * dubbo-remoting-zookeeper <- should move, ditto > > > > * dubbo-remoting-mina <- should move, ditto > > > > ... > > > > > > > > * dubbo-rpc-injvm <- should keep, since local-call is one necessary > > > > feature, think about EJB's local call. > > > > * dubbo-rpc-memcached <- should move > > > > * dubbo-rpc-redis <- should move > > > > * dubbo-rpc-thrift <- should move > > > > * dubbo-rpc-webservice < - should move > > > > ... > > > > > > > > * dubbo-serialization-fastjson <- should keep, very popular json > library > > > > * dubbo-serialization-fst <- should move > > > > * dubbo-serialization-jdk <- should keep, last resort when other > > > > serialization fails to work. > > > > > > > > > > > > Just my two cents, > > > > -Ian. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 16, 2018 at 4:01 PM Jerrick Zhu <jerr...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, community > > > > > > > > > > As you can see, Dubbo now has an ecosystem: > https://github.com/dubbo > > > > > .There > > > > > has a lot of interesting projects there, such as: > > > > > > > > > > * node, go, python and php implementations > > > > > * dubbo rpc, serialization and registry extensions > > > > > * dubbo samples and dubbo useful plugins and tools > > > > > > > > > > Now Dubbo core which is http://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo , > > > it's > > > > > too > > > > > big. As a result, it takes nearly 30~40mins to finish travis CI. > > > > > > > > > > And also, there are a lot of sub modules have never been modified > > > almost, > > > > > such as: > > > > > > > > > > * dubbo-registry-multicast > > > > > * dubbo-registry-redis > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > * dubbo-remoting-grizzly > > > > > * dubbo-remoting-p2p > > > > > * dubbo-remoting-zookeeper > > > > > * dubbo-remoting-mina > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > * dubbo-rpc-injvm > > > > > * dubbo-rpc-memcached > > > > > * dubbo-rpc-redis > > > > > * dubbo-rpc-thrift > > > > > * dubbo-rpc-webservice > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > * dubbo-serialization-fastjson > > > > > * dubbo-serialization-fst > > > > > * dubbo-serialization-jdk > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > So I suggest, move the above sub modules to ecosystem, each of > them as > > > a > > > > > single project, such as > > > https://github.com/dubbo/dubbo-rpc-native-thrift > > > > > > > > > > Also, dubbo-demo also needs to move to ecosystem. > > > > > > > > > > What do u guys think? > > > > > > > > > > Sincerely. > > > > > > > > > > Jerrick > > > > > > > > > > > > >
