I'll try it. Ian Luo <[email protected]> 于2019年1月10日周四 下午2:21写道：
> It is a good suggestion any way, we should give it a try at least. > > -Ian. > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 10:21 AM yuhang xiu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > hi, @jun alpha > > > > I agree. > > If netty can do more precise heartbeat control, we can integrate its > design > > in our heartbeat. Would you like to try it? > > > > Jun Alpha <[email protected]> 于2019年1月9日周三 下午9:21写道： > > > > > Hi,I left a comment in this issue[1],I think it's worth to learn from > > > netty's heartbeat mechanism. > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues/3151 > > > > > > Ian Luo <[email protected]> 于2019年1月7日周一 下午10:47写道： > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 2:50 PM yuhang xiu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, I left some comments in this issue[1] > > > > > > > > > > Thanks to beiwei for reminding. I forgot that we have some > non-netty > > > > > servers. In this case, I personally prefer all heartbeats to use > the > > > same > > > > > set of mechanisms to guarantee. But we can learn from netty's > > heartbeat > > > > > mechanism to ensure more accurate heartbeat control. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo/issues/3151 > > > > > > > > > > Ian Luo <[email protected]> 于2019年1月7日周一 下午1:09写道： > > > > > > > > > > > It is an interesting topic. It is worthy to give it a try when > > Dubbo > > > > uses > > > > > > Netty, but pls. keep in mind that Dubbo has the ability to use > > other > > > > > > servers. I am not sure whether this suggestion will introduce > > > > unnecessary > > > > > > complexity. > > > > > > > > > > > > JingFeng, would you mind to file an issue and give it a try if > you > > > have > > > > > > time? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > -Ian. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 11:03 AM 徐靖峰 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 现状： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dubbo > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 在应用层面发送心跳包保证连接的可用性，使用了定时器的设计，在客户端和服务端分别设置一个定时器，发送心跳，当发现连接断开时，客户端负责重连，服务端负责 > > > > > > > close。使用定时器并不是一个好的设计，在忙通信时，心跳是不必要的。建议使用 Netty 的 > > > > > > > IdleStateHandler，仅仅在检测到空闲连接时发送心跳。 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 修改建议： > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 使用 IdleStateHandler 代替 Timer 发送心跳 > > > > > > > 关闭 ChannelOption.SO_KEEPALIVE，网络层面的 TCP 断连需要在机器级别设置，默认是 2 > > > > > > > 小时，几乎没有必要存在，却发出了无必要的 TCP 探测包，仅仅依赖于应用层的心跳来给连接保活即可。 > > > > > > > For now: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dubbo sends a heartbeat packet at the application level to > ensure > > > the > > > > > > > availability of the connection. A timer is set on the client > and > > > the > > > > > > server > > > > > > > to send a heartbeat. When the connection is found to be > > > disconnected, > > > > > the > > > > > > > client is responsible for reconnection and the server is > > > responsible > > > > > for > > > > > > > close. Using a timer is not a good design, and the heartbeat is > > > > > > unnecessary > > > > > > > when communicating busy. It is recommended to use Netty's > > > > > > IdleStateHandler > > > > > > > to send a heartbeat only when an idle connection is detected. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Proposed changes: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Send heartbeats using IdleStateHandler instead of Timer > > > > > > > Close ChannelOption.SO_KEEPALIVE, TCP disconnection at the > > network > > > > > level > > > > > > > needs to be set at the machine level. The default is 2 hours. > > There > > > > is > > > > > > > almost no need to exist, but an unnecessary TCP probe packet is > > > > issued. > > > > > > It > > > > > > > only depends on the heartbeat of the application layer to keep > > the > > > > > > > connection alive. Just fine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
