Hi,
I also found some dependencies with dual licenses in the binary
distribution, where some of them fall into Category X[1].
Mentors, just to confirm that it is ok to include them?
========================================================================
EPL v1.0 and LGPL 2.1
========================================================================
The following components are provided under the EPL v1.0 and LGPL 2.1.
See project link for details.
The text of each license is also included at licenses/LICENSE-[project].
qos-ch: logback 1.2.3
https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/tree/v_1.2.3 EPL v1.0 and LGPL 2.1
========================================================================
CDDL and GPL 2.0
========================================================================
The following components are provided under the CDDL and GPL 2.0. See
project link for details.
The text of each license is also included at licenses/LICENSE-[project].
javaee: javax.annotation 1.3.2
https://github.com/javaee/javax.annotation/tree/1.3.2 CDDL and GPL 2.0
[1]
https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#what-can-we-not-include-in-an-asf-project-category-x
On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:02 PM Minxuan Zhuang <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hello Dubbo Community,
> because of the license issue in dubbo ops binary release[1], I only
> release the source part for the first version, now this issue has been
> fixed[2], please help me to check if the current licenses are correct,
> thanks
>
> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/98184c2d0c90b4abd2f6f1cfca11b84a4ec869d9ce7d6568d9a75dd4@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-ops/commit/b797145214547616a6a02f6e9701178fc73d7ced
--
Best Regards！
Huxing
