I think it's fine since logback has EPL and javaee has CDDL, but let's hear from mentor's suggestion.
-Ian. On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 3:15 PM Huxing Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I also found some dependencies with dual licenses in the binary > distribution, where some of them fall into Category X[1]. > > Mentors, just to confirm that it is ok to include them? > > ======================================================================== > EPL v1.0 and LGPL 2.1 > ======================================================================== > The following components are provided under the EPL v1.0 and LGPL 2.1. > See project link for details. > The text of each license is also included at licenses/LICENSE-[project]. > > qos-ch: logback 1.2.3 > https://github.com/qos-ch/logback/tree/v_1.2.3 EPL v1.0 and LGPL 2.1 > > ======================================================================== > CDDL and GPL 2.0 > ======================================================================== > The following components are provided under the CDDL and GPL 2.0. See > project link for details. > The text of each license is also included at licenses/LICENSE-[project]. > > javaee: javax.annotation 1.3.2 > https://github.com/javaee/javax.annotation/tree/1.3.2 CDDL and GPL 2.0 > > > [1] > https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#what-can-we-not-include-in-an-asf-project-category-x > > On Fri, Mar 1, 2019 at 2:02 PM Minxuan Zhuang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hello Dubbo Community, > > because of the license issue in dubbo ops binary release[1], I only > > release the source part for the first version, now this issue has been > > fixed[2], please help me to check if the current licenses are correct, > > thanks > > > > [1] > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/98184c2d0c90b4abd2f6f1cfca11b84a4ec869d9ce7d6568d9a75dd4@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > [2] > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-dubbo-ops/commit/b797145214547616a6a02f6e9701178fc73d7ced > > > > -- > Best Regards！ > Huxing >
