-1. So will it be included in 2.7.4 or 2.7.5?
One of our project using annotations came to introduce multiple registries. But we found that there was a bug on subscribing same interface from different registries before 2.7.3(inclusive) util #5033(https://github.com/apache/dubbo/pull/5033) had been merged. But after updating to branch of 2.7.4 we continue to suffer the NPE issue (Location AbstractInterfaceConfig.useRegistryForConfigIfNecessary which is mentioned by @bailei). We will make a temporary build first in our private repository and I suggest it is necessary being included in 2.7.4. Btw, `sonymoon` has already given a fix in his repo (https://github.com/sonymoon/dubbo/commit/7b73f52349d7a37572bb724b28ec62e08d3a29fd). And more pls consider that how to solve the scanning problem mentioned in issue #4895 (https://github.com/apache/dubbo/pull/4895) because it is long time no response. It is not as urgent as the NPE issue. And I will close #4199 now and I think we'd better to describe it in document for those which have mixed versions deployed in environment and also have implemented MonitorService. (The simple solution is just copying the legacy interface into project and public them together). best regards, Jason > On Oct 20, 2019, at 15:00, bailei <[email protected]> wrote: > > -1. > I don’t know if I am qualified from voting. > Is 2.7.4 released? > I think there is a issue need to be checked > (https://github.com/apache/dubbo/issues/5186 > <https://github.com/apache/dubbo/issues/5186>). Fix me if I was wrong. > > >> 在 2019年10月18日，上午9:46，victory <[email protected]> 写道： >> >> We’ve received 3 +1 binding votes and 2 +1 non-binding vote: +1 binding, >> Mercy Ma +1 binding, Justin Mclean +1 binding, Jun Liu +1 non-binding, Lonre >> Wang >> +1 non-binding , 郑泽超 >> >> I will release dubbo-2.7.4 today. Best regards, The Apache Dubbo >> (Incubating) Team >> >> Justin Mclean <[email protected]> 于2019年10月16日周三 上午10:58写道： >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> I checked: >>> - signatures and hashes fine >>> - LICENSE and NOTICE OK >>> - no unexpected binary files >>> - source files have ASF headers >>> - can compile from source >>> >>> RE the software grant normally when a copyright is removed and the headers >>> replaced you need to put something in NOTICE saying this was done. If >>> original headers are left in there then this should be mentioned in >>> LICENSE. I suggest you fix this in the next release >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Justin >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Best Regard! >> cvitory >
