The vote passed with 4 +1 votes:
+1 (binding), Ian Luo,
+1 (binding), Jun Liu,
+1 (binding), Mercy Ma,
+1 (binding), Yuhao Bi,

On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:10 PM Mercy Ma <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 binding
>
> I checked:
> - signatures and hashes fine
> - LICENSE and NOTICE OK
> - no unexpected binary files
> - source files have ASF headers
> - can compile from source
>
> Kind regards,
> Mercy Ma
>
> On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 3:17 PM Yuhao Bi <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > I checked:
> > - signature and hash are fine
> > - LICENSE and NOTICE seems OK
> > - no unexpected binary files
> > - source files have ASF headers
> > - can compile from source code
> >
> > The following UT case[1]  failed in my environment (OpenJDK 1.8.0_222
> > CentOS7),
> > but I think it will not block this release.
> >
> > 1.test_getMethodNames_ContainExtendsParentMethods()
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yuhao Bi
> >
> > Ian Luo <[email protected]> 于2020年3月9日周一 上午11:00写道:
> >
> > > I checked the following items. I vote +1 (binding) to this release.
> > >
> > > [v]  Are release files in correct location?
> > > [v] Are the digital signature and hashes correct?
> > > [v] Do LICENSE and NOTICE files exists?
> > > [v] Is the LICENSE and NOTICE text correct?
> > > [v] Is the NOTICE year correct?
> > > [x] Un-included software dependencies are not mentioned in LICENSE or
> > > NOTICE?
> > > [x] License information is not mentioned in NOTICE?
> > > [x] Is there any 3rd party code contained inside the release? If so:
> > >   [ ] Does the software have a compatible license?
> > >   [ ] Are all software licenses mentioned in LICENSE?
> > >   [ ] Is the full text of the licenses (or pointers to it) in LICENSE?
> > >   Is any of this code Apache licensed? Do they have NOTICE files? If
> so:
> > >     [ ] Have relevant parts of those NOTICE files been added to this
> > NOTICE
> > > file?
> > >     [ ] Do all source files have ASF headers?
> > > [v] Do the contents of the release match with what's tagged in version
> > > control?
> > > [x] Are there any unexpected binary files in the release?
> > > [v] Can you compile from source? Are the instruction clear?
> > >
> > > I vote with:
> > > [v] +1 release the software
> > > [ ] +0 not sure if it should be released
> > > [ ] -1 don’t release the software because..
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > -Ian.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 6:10 PM Jun Liu <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello Dubbo Community,
> > > >
> > > > This is a call for vote to release Apache Dubbo version 2.6.8.
> > > >
> > > > The release candidates:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/dubbo/dubbo/2.6.8/
> > > >
> > > > Git tag for the release:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/dubbo/tree/dubbo-2.6.8
> > > >
> > > > Hash for the release tag:
> > > > 5a6a069986f3627f2d50720c50024df31a3dc38a
> > > >
> > > > Release Notes:
> > > > Backport some changes from 2.7 to 2.6
> > > >
> > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key: 28681CB1, which can be
> > > > found in the keys file:
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/dubbo/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until necessary number
> > of
> > > > votes are reached.
> > > >
> > > > Please vote accordingly:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > The Apache Dubbo Team
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
>
> *Mercy Ma*
> GMail:[email protected]
> Yahoo: [email protected]
> Wetchat: mercyblitz-1985
> Twitter : @mercyblitz <http://twitter.com/mercyblitz>
> Blog    : https://mercyblitz.github.io/
>

Reply via email to