Simply reply to the original VOTE thread prefix the subject with [CANCEL] In the body of the reply, just add comments that the VOTE is cancelled due to exe files found as release artifacts.
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:48 AM, Liangfei.Su <[email protected]> wrote: > Mike, > > I found a sample cancel vote thread. I think a simple cancel with reason > stated should be ok, detailed result could be better. You might follow the > same. > > @Julian, comment? > > > //// reference ( don't know how to make email as attached directly, simply > copy here for refernece.) > > [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Mynewt 0.9.0-incubating-rc1 > > Christopher Collins <[email protected]> > May 28 > > Hello all, > > Voting for the release of 0.9.0-incubating-rc1 has been cancelled due to > some incorrectly packaged source [*]. > > Sorry for the confusion, and thank you to everyone who voted. A second > release candidate will be put up for a vote on the dev list shortly. > > Thanks, > Chris > > [*] For the newt release, a subdirectory was packaged rather than the > entire repo. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Michael Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Julian, > > > > I'd say, it's the quality of the release that is more important than > > anything else. As you mentioned, I'll bring another discussion for this > > issue. BTW, could you let me know if I have to send a result email of > the 2 > > rejected RC to cancel the VOTE? Thanks. > > > > Michael > > > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I feel your pain: it's painful to have two RCs shot down. But let's > > > not have design discussions on a VOTE thread. Let's cancel the vote, > > > and start a discussion in another thread. If there is an existing JIRA > > > for this issue, please forward that; it will help us avoid going over > > > the same old ground. > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:01 AM, Michael Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > @ Hemanth, > > > > > > > > Indeed, we could have kept the tar containing only source code, > without > > > > packaged non-open-source stuffs, I know it's required by Apache > policy, > > > and > > > > agree with the policy totally. > > > > > > > > However, for our project, let's just make an imagination, if we move > > the > > > > jars out of the project and create the source tar, so far for voting > > and > > > > consequently for releasing in the future, each time customers of the > > > > project download the source code, they may be unable to build the > > project > > > > with merely executing maven build commands, on the contrary, they > have > > to > > > > download and place these depended jars appropriately by themselves, > > isn't > > > > it unfriendly and a super boring manner? > > > > > > > > Then, that's why I asked you guys who may know the use of the jars > and > > > may > > > > give valuable suggestions for how to deal better with them, on 1 hand > > not > > > > blocking future maven builds, on the other hand can make it satisfy > > > > apache's release policy. Currently, I'm still not sure if it may > bring > > > many > > > > additional efforts, but customer friendly seems very important to a > > > project. > > > > > > > > So, could you give some details on how much the removal of jars will > > > affect > > > > the build? Appreciated! > > > > > > > > @ all, do you guys have any thought on this issue, please? We seem to > > > have > > > > been blocked a bit at it. Thanks. > > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > Michael > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Dendukuri, Hemanth < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Michael, Since this is voting for source only, we need to make sure > > only > > > >> eagle source if voted. > > > >> > > > >> The artifacts should be uploaded for voting before packaging ("mvn > > > >> package”), I believe. > > > >> > > > >> You can provide the instructions on how to get required tomcat jars > > for > > > >> the build, if eagle has dependencies. > > > >> > > > >> Regards > > > >> Hemanth > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> On 7/7/16, 11:30 PM, "Michael Wu" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> >@ Hemanth, > > > >> > > > > >> >Did you mean to directly remove the > > eagle-assembly/src/main/lib/tomcat > > > >> >directory before packaging the source? I saw the directory removed > in > > > >> >0.3.0-incubating release, do you have any idea about the following > 2: > > > >> >1. does this removal impact building approach and behavior? > > > >> >2. if we remove it, after "mvn package" phase, will the final jar > > > >> assembled > > > >> >have potential running issue with eagle-service? > > > >> > > > > >> >If the jars have dependencies on them, we may have to make more > > > efforts to > > > >> >fix it before voting RC3. > > > >> > > > > >> >Thanks. > > > >> >Michael > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Daniel Zhou < > > [email protected] > > > > > > > >> >wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> +1 > > > >> >> * Built and tested successfully in centos 7 with jdk1.7 > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Regards, > > > >> >> Da > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > On Jul 7, 2016, at 8:33 PM, Jinhu Wu <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > +1 > > > >> >> > * Get the tar package and built successfully on MAC OS X with > JDK > > > >> >> 1.7(java > > > >> >> > version "1.7.0_80") > > > >> >> > * checked md5, sha1 successfully > > > >> >> > * rat checked and is ok > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Jilin <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> +1 > > > >> >> >> * Downloaded & built successfully on windows7 64-bit JDK 1.7 > > > >> >> >> * md5, sha1 check passed > > > >> >> >> * tag matches > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> Thanks for your help > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> 2016-07-08 10:15 GMT+08:00 Zhao Qingwen <[email protected] > >: > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >>> +1 (binding) > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> Best Regards, > > > >> >> >>> Qingwen Zhao | 赵晴雯 > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>> 2016-07-08 8:37 GMT+08:00 Edward Zhang < > > [email protected] > > > >: > > > >> >> >>> > > > >> >> >>>> Sorry, correct my vote from "non-binding" to "binding" :-) > > > >> >> >>>> > > > >> >> >>>> Thanks > > > >> >> >>>> Edward > > > >> >> >>>> > > > >> >> >>>> On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Edward Zhang < > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> >>>> wrote: > > > >> >> >>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> +1 (not-binding) > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> * Downloaded & built successfully with Hotspot JDK1.7 on > OSX > > > >> >> >>>>> * Signature checked, md5, sha1 verified ( > > > >> >> >>>>> https://httpd.apache.org/dev/verification.html) > > > >> >> >>>>> * Apache rat:check passed (mvn apache-rat:check) > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> * Commit and tag matched > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> Thanks > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> Edward > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:04 PM, Michael Wu < > > > [email protected]> > > > >> >> >>> wrote: > > > >> >> >>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> Hi all, > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> This is a release vote for Apache Eagle, version > > > >> 0.4.0-incubating, > > > >> >> >>>> release > > > >> >> >>>>>> candidate 2. > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> Highlighted changes in this release are as the following: > > > >> >> >>>>>> * JBDC Metadata Storage Extension > > > >> >> >>>>>> * Topology management in remote mode including > > > start/stop/status > > > >> >> >>>>>> operations > > > >> >> >>>>>> * Auditlogparser for MapR's audit log > > > >> >> >>>>>> * Oozie auditlog integration for Oozie security > monitoring > > > >> >> >>>>>> * Add applicaiton "maprFSAuditLog" > > > >> >> >>>>>> * Refactor bin/eagle-sandbox-starter.sh to make it easier > > to > > > use > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release. > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> Here's the release note: > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-eagle.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.txt;hb=refs/heads/branch-0.4 > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> The artifacts to be voted on are located at: > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/eagle/0.4.0-incubating-rc2/ > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> The commit to be voted upon: > > > >> >> >>>>>> * > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/commit/23d3ca604a37ccb89d7a95e5c75cfba651673b2a > > > >> >> >>>>>> < > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/commit/23d3ca604a37ccb89d7a95e5c75cfba651673b2a > > > >> >> >>>>>>> * > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> Release tag is: > > > >> >> >>>>>> * > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/releases/tag/v0.4.0-incubating-rc2 > > > >> >> >>>>>> < > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/releases/tag/v0.4.0-incubating-rc2 > > > >> >> >>>>>>> * > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> Release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > >> >> >>>>>> http://people.apache.org/keys/committer/mw.asc > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> The hashes of the artifacts are as follows: > > > >> >> >>>>>> apache-eagle-0.4.0-incubating-src-rc2.tar.gz.md5: > > > >> >> >>>>>> 0a78ed6c36ba57194f6721a8d6bae6f4 > > > >> >> >>>>>> apache-eagle-0.4.0-incubating-src-rc2.tar.gz.sha1: > > > >> >> >>>>>> f59b3d7d894181eb2019bb55f4cf6079a47339eb > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as: Apache Eagle > > > >> >> >>> 0.4.0-incubating. > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if a > > > majority > > > >> of > > > >> >> >> at > > > >> >> >>>>>> least > > > >> >> >>>>>> three +1 PPMC votes are cast. > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this Apache Eagle 0.4.0-incubating Release > > > >> Candidate > > > >> >> >> 2. > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with > the > > > >> release > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> Thanks. > > > >> >> >>>>>> > > > >> >> >>>>>> Michael > > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > > >
