I have commented some assessment points and we can remove that once after they are reviewed.
Thanks Edward On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling Maturity Assessment". > > Eagle community, > > could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please help review and comment? > > - Hao > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > Following the model Julian cited, we created a wiki page for > > self-assessment at: > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment > > . > > Please take a look at it and make your valuable judgement and > instructions. > > > > Overall, according to the aspects that the model values and inspects, and > > traverse the results listed in the wiki page, personally, I think Eagle > is > > approaching the point of graduation, and is facing the right way towards > > it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks) > > > > In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands for the all resolved > > items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that we're striving to work > on > > and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item marked as "NOT APPLY" > > because the "convenient binaries" model seems not fitting for eagle, > could > > you please verify if it's true and rule RE40 > > < > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment-RE40 > > > > > could be skipped? > > > > Any comment and instruction will be appreciated, as all we made or will > > make is to keep the project running in the right way. :) > > > > Michael > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Thanks very much for bringing up graduation discussion for Eagle. > > > > > > Eagle community has almost fully understand how to run an open source > > > project in apache way. Apache Eagle (incubating) is now open to be > > > contributed and adopted by lots of different organizations including > but > > > not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides, Yihaodian, etc. The community > > has > > > continuously been building and expanding itself by sharing and talking > > > eagle with the word industry in international conferences like Hadoop > > > Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, London, Dublin, Shanghai, > > > Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the community has > > successfully > > > release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively preparing v0.5.0 following > apache > > > releasing process. > > > > > > To make it clear how close is eagle ready to graduate, right now the > > > community is working on preparing an "Eagle Podling Maturity > Assessment" > > to > > > measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may remain before > graduation, > > > will be sent out very soon. > > > > > > - Hao > > > > > > On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Graduation is mostly about whether a podling is healthy in terms of > > > > growing the community and making releases. I don't think technical > > issues > > > > are relevant here. > > > > > > > > -Taylor > > > > > > > > > On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I don't think eagle is ready to graduate. > > > > > Because > > > > > 1 Code is not stable. > > > > > 2 Project need more unit test. > > > > > > > > > > Best Wishes > > > > > > > > > > 唐觊隽 > > > > > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept > > > > > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203) > > > > > > > > > > -----邮件原件----- > > > > > 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:[email protected]] > > > > > 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19 > > > > > 收件人: [email protected] > > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate? > > > > > > > > > > Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and will go through > maturity > > > > model first soon. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > Edward > > > > > > > > > >> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> … also want to discuss this with other contributors. > > > > >> > > > > >> Why not discuss with them on this list? > > > > >> > > > > >> Julian > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > >
