I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good.
Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and JIRA (listed in http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html <http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do not seem appropriate places to report security issues, because they are public. Is a private channel needed? Can some other mentors please review? I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is ready to graduate. The community should start taking steps to graduate, including agreeing bylaws (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing an initial PMC chair, crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a vote thread. Julian > On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have commented some assessment points and we can remove that once after > they are reviewed. > > Thanks > Edward > > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling Maturity Assessment". >> >> Eagle community, >> >> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please help review and comment? >> >> - Hao >> >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a wiki page for >>> self-assessment at: >>> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment >>> . >>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable judgement and >> instructions. >>> >>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model values and inspects, and >>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page, personally, I think Eagle >> is >>> approaching the point of graduation, and is facing the right way towards >>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks) >>> >>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands for the all resolved >>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that we're striving to work >> on >>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item marked as "NOT APPLY" >>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems not fitting for eagle, >> could >>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40 >>> < >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment-RE40 >>>> >>> could be skipped? >>> >>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated, as all we made or will >>> make is to keep the project running in the right way. :) >>> >>> Michael >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation discussion for Eagle. >>>> >>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how to run an open source >>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle (incubating) is now open to be >>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different organizations including >> but >>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides, Yihaodian, etc. The community >>> has >>>> continuously been building and expanding itself by sharing and talking >>>> eagle with the word industry in international conferences like Hadoop >>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, London, Dublin, Shanghai, >>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the community has >>> successfully >>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively preparing v0.5.0 following >> apache >>>> releasing process. >>>> >>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to graduate, right now the >>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle Podling Maturity >> Assessment" >>> to >>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may remain before >> graduation, >>>> will be sent out very soon. >>>> >>>> - Hao >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling is healthy in terms of >>>>> growing the community and making releases. I don't think technical >>> issues >>>>> are relevant here. >>>>> >>>>> -Taylor >>>>> >>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate. >>>>>> Because >>>>>> 1 Code is not stable. >>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test. >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Wishes >>>>>> >>>>>> 唐觊隽 >>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept >>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203) >>>>>> >>>>>> -----邮件原件----- >>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19 >>>>>> 收件人: [email protected] >>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate? >>>>>> >>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and will go through >> maturity >>>>> model first soon. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> Edward >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other contributors. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Julian >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>
