Hi Eagle Community, It's been more than 2 months and a lot have been improved since we last time discussed Eagle graduation. Here I want to suggest we restart discussion of Eagle graduation. Please share your comments.
Some documents and data are as follows: 1. Maturity assessment, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment 2. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Documentation 3. Four new committers were added since incubation 4. Two releases are made 5. >600 Jira tickets, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EAGLE-614?jql=project%20%3D%20EAGLE 6. ~500 pull requests. https://github.com/apache/incubator-eagle/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr Thanks Edward On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Ge, Jing <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jijun, > > Thanks for your nice feedback and excellent contribution. We appreciate it. > > Best regards > Jing > > On 9/30/16, 8:43 PM, "Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽)" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Great work! Great advances have been made for Apache Eagle. > I think Apache Eagle will became a great project for community with > these improvement. > > Best Wishes > > 唐觊隽 > Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept > Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai (201203) > > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: Ge, Jing [mailto:[email protected]] > 发送时间: 2016年9月30日 19:50 > 收件人: [email protected]; Tang Jijun(上海_技术部_数据平台_唐觊隽) > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate? > > Hi Jijun, > > Thanks for pointing out where we can improve ourselves. We have been > working on that since we got your email. Now: > > 1. We have CI server which will make sure the code will be stable and > build will be successful. > 2. We have more than 430 Unit tests. > 3. We have published fundamental documentation to let user and > developer understand Eagle and will continue working on them a. Development > Guide https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide > b. Product features introduction https://cwiki.apache.org/ > confluence/display/EAG/Development+Guide > c. More information w.r.t. roadmap or technical design, etc. can be > found at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle > > Speaking of documentation, many thanks for your contribution to the > Alert Engine on Spark Streaming https://cwiki.apache.org/ > confluence/display/EAG/Alert+Engine+on+Spark+Streaming. We really > appreciate it. > > Your concerns should be solved. please let us know your thoughts. > > Best regards > Jing > > On 9/1/16, 1:17 PM, "Michael Wu" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Security page at http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html > is > updated with new content, please review if it conforms to what we > expected. > > On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Michael Wu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hi mentors, > > > > I will update security page content taking the mentioned aspects. > > > > Except for the security part, is there any other gaps that you > feel eagle > > has to fill before graduation? Please feel free to point issues > out and we > > will do our best to get aligned to what graduation requires. > Thanks. > > > > Michael > > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> I did a quick survey, and it seems that most projects do not > have a > >> security team[1], which means that vulnerabilities should be > reported to > >> [email protected]. Of the projects that do, Kafka seems a > good model > >> to follow; its security page is simple and clear[2]. > >> > >> Julian > >> > >> [1] http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html < > >> http://www.apache.org/security/projects.html> > >> > >> [2] http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html < > >> http://kafka.apache.org/project-security.html> > >> > >> > >> > On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:29 PM, P. Taylor Goetz < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > The maturity model assessment looks good to me, though I > haven't delved > >> deep into it. > >> > > >> > Regarding security issues, since Eagle is a security-related > product I > >> would expect there to be a well-defined process/protocol that > ensured > >> vulnerability reports were kept private until patched, CVE > process, etc. > >> Eagle hasn't had any major security issues during incubation, > but should be > >> prepared for them after graduation. > >> > > >> > Here [1] [2] are two great resources for understanding what > is expected > >> from an ASF standpoint. > >> > > >> > -Taylor > >> > > >> > [1] http://www.apache.org/security/ > >> > [2] http://www.apache.org/security/committers.html > >> > > >> >> On Aug 23, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Julian Hyde <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I reviewed https://cwiki.apache.org/confl > >> uence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podling+Maturity+Assessment < > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+Podli > >> ng+Maturity+Assessment> and it looks good. > >> >> > >> >> Only one issue. Regarding QU30: The dev list and JIRA > (listed in > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html < > >> http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/sup/index.html>) do not seem > >> appropriate places to report security issues, because they are > public. Is a > >> private channel needed? > >> >> > >> >> Can some other mentors please review? > >> >> > >> >> I think the consensus is emerging that Eagle is ready to > graduate. The > >> community should start taking steps to graduate, including > agreeing bylaws > >> (or deciding that bylaws are not necessary), choosing an > initial PMC chair, > >> crafting the resolution for the Board, and starting a vote > thread. > >> >> > >> >> Julian > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> On Jul 31, 2016, at 9:05 PM, Edward Zhang < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> I have commented some assessment points and we can remove > that once > >> after > >> >>> they are reviewed. > >> >>> > >> >>> Thanks > >> >>> Edward > >> >>> > >> >>>> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Hao Chen <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Thanks Michael for preparing the "Eagle Podling Maturity > Assessment". > >> >>>> > >> >>>> Eagle community, > >> >>>> > >> >>>> could you (in particular Mentors & PPMC) please help > review and > >> comment? > >> >>>> > >> >>>> - Hao > >> >>>> > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Michael Wu < > [email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Hi guys, > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Following the model Julian cited, we created a wiki page > for > >> >>>>> self-assessment at: > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+ > Podlin > >> g+Maturity+Assessment > >> >>>>> . > >> >>>>> Please take a look at it and make your valuable judgement > and > >> >>>> instructions. > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Overall, according to the aspects that the model values > and > >> inspects, and > >> >>>>> traverse the results listed in the wiki page, personally, > I think > >> Eagle > >> >>>> is > >> >>>>> approaching the point of graduation, and is facing the > right way > >> towards > >> >>>>> it. (please correct me if i'm wrong, thanks) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> In this assessment wiki page, status "OK" stands for the > all > >> resolved > >> >>>>> items, status "ON GOING" stands for 2 items that we're > striving to > >> work > >> >>>> on > >> >>>>> and will update. Additionally, there is 1 item marked as > "NOT APPLY" > >> >>>>> because the "convenient binaries" model seems not fitting > for eagle, > >> >>>> could > >> >>>>> you please verify if it's true and rule RE40 > >> >>>>> < > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/EAG/Eagle+ > Podlin > >> g+Maturity+Assessment#EaglePodlingMaturityAssessment-RE40 > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> could be skipped? > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Any comment and instruction will be appreciated, as all > we made or > >> will > >> >>>>> make is to keep the project running in the right way. :) > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>> Michael > >> >>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Hao Chen < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Thanks very much for bringing up graduation discussion > for Eagle. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> Eagle community has almost fully understand how to run > an open > >> source > >> >>>>>> project in apache way. Apache Eagle (incubating) is now > open to be > >> >>>>>> contributed and adopted by lots of different > organizations > >> including > >> >>>> but > >> >>>>>> not limited to eBay, Paypal, Dataguides, Yihaodian, etc. > The > >> community > >> >>>>> has > >> >>>>>> continuously been building and expanding itself by > sharing and > >> talking > >> >>>>>> eagle with the word industry in international > conferences like > >> Hadoop > >> >>>>>> Summit, Hadoop Stratus, QCon in San Jose, London, > Dublin, Shanghai, > >> >>>>>> Beijing, etc. and also lots of meetups. And the > community has > >> >>>>> successfully > >> >>>>>> release v0.3.0, v0.4.0 and is actively preparing v0.5.0 > following > >> >>>> apache > >> >>>>>> releasing process. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> To make it clear how close is eagle ready to graduate, > right now > >> the > >> >>>>>> community is working on preparing an "Eagle Podling > Maturity > >> >>>> Assessment" > >> >>>>> to > >> >>>>>> measure how mature eagle is and what tasks may remain > before > >> >>>> graduation, > >> >>>>>> will be sent out very soon. > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> - Hao > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 11:25 AM, P. Taylor Goetz < > >> [email protected]> > >> >>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> Graduation is mostly about whether a podling is healthy > in terms > >> of > >> >>>>>>> growing the community and making releases. I don't > think technical > >> >>>>> issues > >> >>>>>>> are relevant here. > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> -Taylor > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> On Jul 28, 2016, at 8:12 PM, Tang > Jijun(上海_技术部_架构部_大数据平台_唐觊隽) < > >> >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> I don't think eagle is ready to graduate. > >> >>>>>>>> Because > >> >>>>>>>> 1 Code is not stable. > >> >>>>>>>> 2 Project need more unit test. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Best Wishes > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> 唐觊隽 > >> >>>>>>>> Jr. Engineer , Architecture - Fundation, Tech Dept > >> >>>>>>>> Floor 4, 295 ZUCHONGZHI RD, Zhangjiang, Shanghai > (201203) > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> -----邮件原件----- > >> >>>>>>>> 发件人: Edward Zhang [mailto:[email protected]] > >> >>>>>>>> 发送时间: 2016年7月29日 5:19 > >> >>>>>>>> 收件人: [email protected] > >> >>>>>>>> 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] Is Eagle ready to graduate? > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should discuss that on the list, and will go > through > >> >>>> maturity > >> >>>>>>> model first soon. > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>> Thanks > >> >>>>>>>> Edward > >> >>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Julian Hyde < > [email protected]> > >> >>>>>> wrote: > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>>> … also want to discuss this with other contributors. > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Why not discuss with them on this list? > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> Julian > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>>>> > >> >>>>>>> > >> >>>>>> > >> >>>>> > >> >>>> > >> >> > >> > >> > > > > > > >
