Hi Justin, I updated the report and here are some questions about it.
As about "When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?", we don't have new committers or PPMC members elected after the initiation. So should I fill in NA or the initiation date? As about release version, we tagged "rc" for release candidate version. Does that mean rc version can never be available to the public? That would make the whole process too long for a new release. Is there anything else we could do? For the other problems, hopefully, I've updated in the report. Zhang Wenli http://zhangwenli.com On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 4:13 AM Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for submitting a report however it's a little light on detail and > missing some information. Could you please update this. > > Can you think of something better than "3. Fixing bugs and improving > features" as a step towards graduation? What does the project need to aim > for in order to graduate? > > I see you have put N/A under "When were the last committers or PPMC > members elected?" I don't believe this is correct. > > You are also missing information on the current release vote. > > While there's no requirement to do so, I find that you get a better > quality report if it is discussed on the list and is a collaborative > effort. Perhaps try this next time? > > It's also come to my attention that you have unproved releases here [1], > the PPMC can't release any software to the general public that hasn't been > approved for release. Please remove those releases. Please mention what you > are going to doing to address this in your report. > > Thanks, > Justin > > P.S I am not subscribed to this list so please CC me on any replies. > > 1. https://www.npmjs.com/package/echarts > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
