Are you talking about the email with subject: "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache
ECharts 4.2.1 (release candidate 1)" from 1/29 started by you?

I haven't dug in and checked everything like LICENSES and headers or the
signatures and but overall it looks really strong and I would vote +1
but you need to have sha256 or sha512 signatures to verify the zip file.

I will setup a suitable node.js environment for this so I can test
future builds and be more involved.

Regards,
KAM

On 1/30/2019 11:05 AM, Ovilia wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> We've published our release vote on general@, but it has got no reply by
> now.
> Could you have a look at it, and give a +1 perhaps?
>
> Zhang Wenli
> http://zhangwenli.com
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 11:34 PM Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi -
>>
>> Also, the project did begin discussions about adding a committer on
>> private@. These stalled, but can be restarted now.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Dave
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Jan 30, 2019, at 7:24 AM, Kevin A. McGrail <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Nice response Shuang.  If I can help with the voting process for
>>> releases, etc., please let me know.
>>>
>>> I can also try to help with adding more committers, writing notices,
>>> etc. to try and get more interest on Social Media even.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> KAM
>>>> On 1/30/2019 3:11 AM, SHUANG SU wrote:
>>>> Hi Justin,
>>>>
>>>> I am afraid it is inevitable to push the rc version to npm. Without
>> that,
>>>> the build
>>>> process and some local CI process can not be performed, which causes the
>>>> developers
>>>> concerning about this project can not test whether the release
>> candidate is
>>>> qualified to be released.
>>>> But the rc version is not tagged as "latest" in npm, so the public can
>> not
>>>> get this version
>>>> by `npm install`. So it will not make bad effect, just like publishing
>> the
>>>> rc pack to the
>>>> Apache svn dev repo [1].
>>>>
>>>> But the published `4.2.0-rc.2` on npm you saw in [2] is tagged as
>> "latest"
>>>> and have been
>>>> published to the public. That is incorrect according to the Apache
>> rule. We
>>>> should have
>>>> removed it. But unfortunately we have missed the opportunity to do that.
>>>> Many outsider
>>>> projects or systems have depended on that, and the removal will cause
>> some
>>>> disaster.
>>>>
>>>> This mistake was made because we did not clear enough about the total
>>>> release process.
>>>> But having this experience, this mistake will not happen again. Only the
>>>> official release
>>>> will be directed to publish in npm from now on.
>>>>
>>>> 1. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/
>>>> 2. https://www.npmjs.com/package/echarts
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>> Su Shuang (100pah)
>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 15:14, Justin Mclean <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>>> HI,
>>>>>
>>>>>> As about "When were the last committers or PPMC members elected?", we
>>>>> don't have new committers or PPMC members elected after the
>> initiation. So
>>>>> should I fill in NA or the initiation date?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, but being a year in incubation without adding any committer or PMC
>>>>> members is concerning, especially given the number of contributors to
>> the
>>>>> project. You might want to put in the report what is being done to
>> address
>>>>> this.There’s some tasks mentioned on the private list that need to be
>>>>> followed up on by the PPMC I think.
>>>>>
>>>>>> As about release version, we tagged "rc" for release candidate
>> version.
>>>>> Does that mean rc version can never be available to the public?
>>>>>
>>>>> Release candidates should not be made available to the general public,
>>>>> they can be made available to people who follow the dev list. [1] They
>> can
>>>>> be placed here. [2]
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Justin
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#unreleased
>>>>> 2. http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#stage
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> --
>>> Kevin A. McGrail
>>> VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
>>> Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
>>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>>>
>>

-- 
Kevin A. McGrail
VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to