Hi Chris, Why does appended-resources/licenses contains more than the licenses than those referenced by META-INF/LICENSE files? I see just MIT, BSD 3-Clause and BSD 2.Clause referenced from the LICENSE files.
Why are these present: apache-license-version-2.0.txt (will be necessary if gson and metrics-core are added to LICENSE :-) cddl+gplv2* eclipse-public-license* Justin, just double checking, I thought we MUST include ALL BUNDLED external artifacts in our LICENSE? If not, at least “can” they be included? Just seems best. Specifically gson and metrics-core are bundled but absent. And I find it confusing that our NOTICE includes info for a bundled item that’s not mentioned in our LICENSE (metrics-core). Note, our current release’s binary bundle LICENSE included references for them. I’d also like to pull on the JSR-166 reference that Chris added to LICENSE. Is that supposed to be in NOTICE? I see that in nifi that’s where they have it along with the metric-core reference (like we have in our NOTICE) https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-assembly/NOTICE <https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-assembly/NOTICE> It also seems wrong to have a JSR-166 reference in our LICENSE and not have some corresponding license reference to go with it. Thanks! — Dale
