Personally, I'm more a fan of "powered by" :-) Ethan
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe <[email protected]> wrote: > LOL shifting blame always works :-> > > What about your "powered by ESME" idea? > Should we try that instead? > > /Anne > > > On 3 February 2011 11:12, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Dick's idea ;-) >> >> Thanks for shifting the blame ;-> >> >> >>> >>> /Anne >>> >>> >>> On 3 February 2011 10:21, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Anne, >>>> >>>> Thanks for putting these together. I guess I'm not thrilled with the >>>> whole "ESME Inside" idea. Seems a little too Intel-ish :-) What are we >>>> thinking of using these for? >> >> For sites that are are based on ESME- a little advertising ... just an >> idea of course ... we can use them but we don't have to use them. >> >>>> >>>> Ethan >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> We also need to choose an ESME Inside logo. >>>>> Please take a look at the suggestions on the bottom of this page >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ESME/Branding and let me >>>>> know which one you like best. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Anne >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
