IMHO, "powered by" sounds better. 2011/2/3 Ethan Jewett <[email protected]>
> Personally, I'm more a fan of "powered by" :-) > > Ethan > > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > <[email protected]> wrote: > > LOL shifting blame always works :-> > > > > What about your "powered by ESME" idea? > > Should we try that instead? > > > > /Anne > > > > > > On 3 February 2011 11:12, Richard Hirsch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Dick's idea ;-) > >> > >> Thanks for shifting the blame ;-> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> /Anne > >>> > >>> > >>> On 3 February 2011 10:21, Ethan Jewett <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hi Anne, > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for putting these together. I guess I'm not thrilled with the > >>>> whole "ESME Inside" idea. Seems a little too Intel-ish :-) What are we > >>>> thinking of using these for? > >> > >> For sites that are are based on ESME- a little advertising ... just an > >> idea of course ... we can use them but we don't have to use them. > >> > >>>> > >>>> Ethan > >>>> > >>>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Anne Kathrine Petterøe > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> We also need to choose an ESME Inside logo. > >>>>> Please take a look at the suggestions on the bottom of this page > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ESME/Branding and let me > >>>>> know which one you like best. > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Anne > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > > > -- Best Regards, Vladimir Ivanov
