If you are using the integrated derby database, then you are probably
using it for multiple versions - which might not be a good thing. I
haven't tried it yet. Look for a folder called esme_db.

If you are using tomcat, try a clean build and then run esme with
jetty:run to see if the problem still exists. You may also want to
delete your browser cookies. That might be a problem as well.

D.


On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Jack Park <[email protected]> wrote:
> What I mean is that the timelines stopped working entirely, but the tags
> that were visible (this is the 1.2 distribution tarball).
>
> I shut the system down and built the 1.3 rc-1 distribution tarball and ran
> that only to discover that tags were not working there.  I then went back to
> the original 1.2 distro, booted it, noted my two users could still log in,
> but there are no timelines visible. Sending messages do not appear anywhere.
>
> I then went and booted the subversion 1.2 rc-1 tag; no tags, and adding a
> user to a pool fails.
>
> I then went and booted the subversion trunk. Same issues.
>
> All that to say that I had active timelines in the 1.2 distribution until I
> started running other distributions.  By way of weak inference, I have to
> wonder if there is anything like a shared database among those builds.
>
> Jack
>
> On 7/28/2011 7:33 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean by " no messages sent from it show up anywhere"?
>> There are no messages in the timeline? Tagged messages?
>>
>> D.
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Jack Park<[email protected]>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> I returned to 1.2 and found, now, that it remembers the tags, but not any
>>> of
>>> the messages. In fact, no messages sent from it show up anywhere. Time
>>> for
>>> some coffee, I suppose.
>>>
>>> On 7/28/2011 11:10 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I just tried it on the stax instance and added the user "acmebob" to a
>>>> pool and it worked.
>>>>
>>>> Regarding the "Edit" button for pools. Right now it is not correctly
>>>> labeled, because you can just add users. But we plan to be able to
>>>> change other parts of the group (rename, etc) and then hopefully the
>>>> "edit" label will be correct.
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Jack Park<[email protected]>
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Where the messages never stop!
>>>>> Went back to 1.2 with what I learned playing with 1.3.
>>>>> 1.2 lets me add "joe" as a user to my pool.
>>>>> So, I suspect 1.3 is broken in terms of adding users to pools.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jack
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7/28/2011 10:59 AM, Jack Park wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Slight update. What I know about pools came from 1.2. In 1.3, pools
>>>>>> behave a bit differently, or so it seems. I found that the (misnamed?)
>>>>>> Edit button lets me add a member. I tried adding the other user
>>>>>> ("joe").
>>>>>> Clicking add user does nothing. "joe" is a real user visible in the
>>>>>> user's list.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope to learn what you can do when you have a pool. Can you assign
>>>>>> messages to the pool? Can pools be private?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jack
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7/28/2011 10:39 AM, Jack Park wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Now that I've got your attention, may I ask for links to explanations
>>>>>>> about pools and, while we're at it, tokens? I have some hints about
>>>>>>> tokens, but absolutely no clue about pools. I created one, thinking
>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>> might be a "group" (a feature I want), but when I came in as a
>>>>>>> different
>>>>>>> user, I was not able to "join" that pool.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>> Jack
>>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to