Hi Jack, Just by way of explanation, I think that there have been some significant changes to the timeline Javascript files between 1.2, 1.3, and the upcoming 1.4. Most likely your browser was trying to use a cached 1.3 .js file with the 1.2 backend code-base. That would definitely not work as we changed some function and variable names, so the backend was spitting out JS variables and functions to the browser but the javascript already running in the browser had no idea what to do with it.
Hopefully that explains the problem. Sorry for the apparent flakiness. Cheers, Ethan On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Jack Park <[email protected]> wrote: > My "virgin" browser was IE whatever comes with Win7. The others are Chrome > and FF. Clearing their cache fixed it. Everything is running well now, with > the 1.2 distro. I have not migrated back to trunk or 1.3 yet. Overall, it > was the cache issue, but I did drop the database and start over. I now have > three users running in it. > Created quite a few messages, some into a shared pool for two of the users. > I gave a member Write roll. He can write and the admin sees, but he cannot > read. Not sure if that's a bug? > > Looking forward to the latest build running well. > Thanks > Jack > > On 7/28/2011 8:18 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote: >> >> Did you delete the old db? If you deleted the old db, then the old >> users are gone and you have to sign up again. If it was the first >> message after starting then it might take a while for the message to >> appear. Create 5 messages over a few minutes time span and see if the >> problem still exists. >> >> What browser are you using? There was an older bug with >> InternetExplorer that some messages weren't being displayed. >> >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 5:09 AM, Jack Park<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> I did a clean rebuild of the 1.2 distribution and ran mvn jetty:run >>> Logging in does not work at all. If I Sign Up and create a user, then I'm >>> in >>> and I can send a message with a tag. The tag shows, the timeline does >>> not. >>> But, when clicking users, that user's last message is visible. Something >>> fails in painting timelines. >>> Next trial will be to attempt to replicate this on a completely different >>> computer. >>> >>> On 7/28/2011 7:55 PM, Jack Park wrote: >>>> >>>> All trials were with mvn jetty:run. >>>> Thanks for the pointer: every database is separate. >>>> I just noticed that each, whether I'm using it or not, has a db.lck >>>> >>>> I just ran an experiment: removed the db.lck file in the 1.2 >>>> distribution (I don't know that much about Derby) and now it refuses to >>>> respond to the Sign On button. >>>> >>>> Still fiddling. >>>> >>>> Jack >>>> >>>> On 7/28/2011 7:46 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>> >>>>> If you are using the integrated derby database, then you are probably >>>>> using it for multiple versions - which might not be a good thing. I >>>>> haven't tried it yet. Look for a folder called esme_db. >>>>> >>>>> If you are using tomcat, try a clean build and then run esme with >>>>> jetty:run to see if the problem still exists. You may also want to >>>>> delete your browser cookies. That might be a problem as well. >>>>> >>>>> D. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Jack Park<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> What I mean is that the timelines stopped working entirely, but the >>>>>> tags >>>>>> that were visible (this is the 1.2 distribution tarball). >>>>>> >>>>>> I shut the system down and built the 1.3 rc-1 distribution tarball >>>>>> and ran >>>>>> that only to discover that tags were not working there. I then went >>>>>> back to >>>>>> the original 1.2 distro, booted it, noted my two users could still >>>>>> log in, >>>>>> but there are no timelines visible. Sending messages do not appear >>>>>> anywhere. >>>>>> >>>>>> I then went and booted the subversion 1.2 rc-1 tag; no tags, and >>>>>> adding a >>>>>> user to a pool fails. >>>>>> >>>>>> I then went and booted the subversion trunk. Same issues. >>>>>> >>>>>> All that to say that I had active timelines in the 1.2 distribution >>>>>> until I >>>>>> started running other distributions. By way of weak inference, I have >>>>>> to >>>>>> wonder if there is anything like a shared database among those builds. >>>>>> >>>>>> Jack >>>>>> >>>>>> On 7/28/2011 7:33 PM, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What do you mean by " no messages sent from it show up anywhere"? >>>>>>> There are no messages in the timeline? Tagged messages? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> D. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Jack Park<[email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I returned to 1.2 and found, now, that it remembers the tags, but >>>>>>>> not any >>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>> the messages. In fact, no messages sent from it show up anywhere. >>>>>>>> Time >>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>> some coffee, I suppose. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 7/28/2011 11:10 AM, Richard Hirsch wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I just tried it on the stax instance and added the user "acmebob" >>>>>>>>> to a >>>>>>>>> pool and it worked. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regarding the "Edit" button for pools. Right now it is not >>>>>>>>> correctly >>>>>>>>> labeled, because you can just add users. But we plan to be able to >>>>>>>>> change other parts of the group (rename, etc) and then hopefully >>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>> "edit" label will be correct. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> D. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Jack >>>>>>>>> Park<[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Where the messages never stop! >>>>>>>>>> Went back to 1.2 with what I learned playing with 1.3. >>>>>>>>>> 1.2 lets me add "joe" as a user to my pool. >>>>>>>>>> So, I suspect 1.3 is broken in terms of adding users to pools. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jack >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 7/28/2011 10:59 AM, Jack Park wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Slight update. What I know about pools came from 1.2. In 1.3, >>>>>>>>>>> pools >>>>>>>>>>> behave a bit differently, or so it seems. I found that the >>>>>>>>>>> (misnamed?) >>>>>>>>>>> Edit button lets me add a member. I tried adding the other user >>>>>>>>>>> ("joe"). >>>>>>>>>>> Clicking add user does nothing. "joe" is a real user visible in >>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>> user's list. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I hope to learn what you can do when you have a pool. Can you >>>>>>>>>>> assign >>>>>>>>>>> messages to the pool? Can pools be private? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Jack >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On 7/28/2011 10:39 AM, Jack Park wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Now that I've got your attention, may I ask for links to >>>>>>>>>>>> explanations >>>>>>>>>>>> about pools and, while we're at it, tokens? I have some hints >>>>>>>>>>>> about >>>>>>>>>>>> tokens, but absolutely no clue about pools. I created one, >>>>>>>>>>>> thinking >>>>>>>>>>>> it >>>>>>>>>>>> might be a "group" (a feature I want), but when I came in as a >>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>> user, I was not able to "join" that pool. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>>>> Jack >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> >
