Leo Simons wrote:
I like gump [1]. Do you?
A RT: how does it compare in terms of features with other
continuous-integration packages out there,
cruisecontrol, damagecontrol, etc ... ?
I personally think excalibur should participate actively and "properly"
in gump builds. What I don't like is maintaining that gump integration
all by myself (or with a small subset of the active committers) and
having to fix things that get broken because some people are not aware
how gump works. That's how it has always been @ avalon, and I'm not
prepared to keep that rhytm up. No fun.
Are you guys prepared to invest the neccessary time and energy to
maintain good gump integration? How much energy?
how much effort and energy is required to keep up gump integration?
cheers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/
