Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira wrote: > > Hello, dude! > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Is it this way? If so, I wouldn't understand the > performance problem > > :) > > Nevertheless, dude, is there anything better than give the > user the blessing of choice? :-) > > If he wants proxy benefits, he can turn it on - or in my view > use an extended container - if he doesn't, well, use the > simplest container. I think the keel's guys pointed out good > arguments for that strategy. > Sure, freedom of choice is most often good - but might lead to end in an FS (flexibility syndrom). But ok, I understand this and let's see if we can make our container better customizable. But we should make sure that our simplest version of the container (without any extension) has more value over a simple map :)
Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/
