Leo Simons wrote:

Hi gang,

LF5 seems to be on its way out. Is anyone using it together with logkit? I suggest we follow suit with what log4j is doing and stop supporting it. Objections?


I'm certainly biased as I wrote the Logkit/LF5 bridge, but it's very useful to be able to follow logs in a GUI, and used a lot by non-techie users of Cocoon.

So my advice would be to keep it around until we have the equivalent with Chainsaw. Writing the bridge was easy with LF5 as the logging event was abstracted, whereas a quick look at Chainsaw shows that it's intimately bound to Log4J's LogEvent.

So either we fork LF5 (which IIUC is no more in log4j's trunk) or write the logkit->chainsaw bridge which may not be that easy than with LF5.

My 0.02 euros...

Sylvain

--
Sylvain Wallez                                  Anyware Technologies
http://www.apache.org/~sylvain           http://www.anyware-tech.com
{ XML, Java, Cocoon, OpenSource }*{ Training, Consulting, Projects }


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/



Reply via email to