> On Jan. 8, 2016, 5:06 a.m., pavan kumar kolamuri wrote:
> > prism/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/service/FeedSLAMonitoringService.java,
> >  line 344
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/41978/diff/2/?file=1186384#file1186384line344>
> >
> >     If entity end time is over why we are not calling onRemove(entity) on 
> > that ?
> 
> Ajay Yadava wrote:
>     Good Question. If we do that then there is a risk of loosing the sla 
> monitoring for last few instances. In this case we just don't want to add any 
> instances after end date and monitoring for other instances should continue.

Ok undertsand, but atleast after some time we should remove these entities from 
the list right ?


- pavan kumar


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/41978/#review113409
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Jan. 8, 2016, 10:57 a.m., Ajay Yadava wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/41978/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 8, 2016, 10:57 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Falcon.
> 
> 
> Bugs: FALCON-1678
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FALCON-1678
> 
> 
> Repository: falcon-git
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> SLA Monitoring does not honour entity end date
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/entity/FeedHelper.java 150e0bd 
>   common/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/util/DeploymentProperties.java 
> 715b7ba 
>   common/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/entity/FeedHelperTest.java 9841083 
>   prism/src/main/java/org/apache/falcon/service/FeedSLAMonitoringService.java 
> 1cd571e 
>   prism/src/test/java/org/apache/falcon/service/FeedSLAMonitoringTest.java 
> e3dd5cc 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/41978/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Added unit tests for main and helper methods.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ajay Yadava
> 
>

Reply via email to