Marcel Offermans wrote:
On May 21, 2007, at 15:08 , Richard S. Hall wrote:
Tim Moloney wrote:
I agree with the proposed roadmap. My only comment is on the name
of the plugin. bundleplugin doesn't follow the Maven convention of
maven-foo-plugin or foo-maven-plugin.
Is there some reason for this convention? It ends up violating our
own convention of naming generated artifacts after their own package
root in our repo (e.g., org.apache.felix.bundleplugin-0.9.0.jar).
If the general view is that we should follow this convention (which I
wasn't aware of), then I will change it back.
I think we should make an effort here to support their naming
convention. I'm assuming it's not difficult to do, and this plugin is
a bit of a special case anyway.
Ok, I can do the rename...ultimately, this is not a big issue since it
is mostly a POM file change, changing the artifactId to
"maven-bundle-plugin". We can actually keep the package name as
org.apache.felix.bundleplugin, since that is independent of the
artifactId...or I guess we could change it to
org.apache.felix.mavenbundleplugin to approximate the artifactId...
Opinions?
Furthermore, we should release this plugin separately from the core
(we just need to release both the core and this plugin asap, maybe
even the plugin first and then the 1.0 core release).
Agreed.
-> richard
Greetings, Marcel
