+1
... or just consider me as having "lazy consensus"
- Rob
Richard S. Hall wrote:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the
incubator
references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
vote on accepting this document:
[x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
[ ] 0 - Don't care.
[ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting
is not truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff.
"Hey, I made the following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?"
I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more
than was originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly
fading away... :o(
I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this
document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be
decided by laziness. :-)
Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the
long run to make it solid...
Thanks.
-> richard
--
Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+44 (0)20 7488 3470
www.ascert.com
