+1
On 7/26/07, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > regards, > > Karl > > On 7/24/07, Clement Escoffier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > > > Clement > > > > Richard S. Hall wrote: > > > Niclas Hedhman wrote: > > >> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote: > > >> > > >>> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the > > >>> incubator > > >>> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please > > >>> vote on accepting this document: > > >>> > > >>> > > >> [x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document. > > >> [ ] 0 - Don't care. > > >> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document. > > >> > > >> I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting > > >> is not truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff. > > >> "Hey, I made the following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?" > > >> I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more > > >> than was originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly > > >> fading away... :o( > > >> > > > > > > I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this > > > document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be > > > decided by laziness. :-) > > > > > >> Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the > > >> long run to make it solid... > > >> > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > -> richard > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > +44 (0)20 7488 3470 > > www.ascert.com > > > > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
