On 7/26/07, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 July 2007 20:53, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> >> Now, I have the hope that releasing is just a matter of invoking maven
> >> (with the correct arguments).
> >
> > First step is just the production of a parent pom, for the Commons to depend
> > on. IMHO, that is not really a release (no tarball) and can be done by lazy
> > consensus (go ahead).
> Yes, I agree - good idea.
>
> >
> > Second step to release Commons would be a proper release with tarball /dist
> > stuff, and requires Vote of the PMC for legal reasons.
> Yes, this raises the question of how the release of commons should look
> like. So far I thought about just releasing the pom and the jar - not
> sure if we need a src and bin dist here?

I'm not sure I really like the idea that we create all those artifacts
of other projects. I was assuming that we would only provide the
wrapper pom's as a starting point for the projects to ultimately make
their stuff available as bundles by themselves.

It might just be me so fell free to ignore this if nobody else has a
strange felling about providing and maintaining all those artifacts...

regards,

Karl

> > IMHO, Carsten is more than qualified to handle these things, as he has
> > released Cocoon several times in the past, which is one hell of a beast...
> > So, don't hinder the guy ;o)
> Thanks - now you put even more pressure on me :)
>
> Carsten
>
>
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>


-- 
Karl Pauls
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to