Karl Pauls wrote: > > I'm not sure I really like the idea that we create all those artifacts > of other projects. I was assuming that we would only provide the > wrapper pom's as a starting point for the projects to ultimately make > their stuff available as bundles by themselves. > > It might just be me so fell free to ignore this if nobody else has a > strange felling about providing and maintaining all those artifacts... > Actually, I'm not sure if we should provide these wrappers, either. But if we provide the poms we should provide the binary artifacts as well. It would be imho a bad idea to release a pom and everyone else is then able to download this pom and build its own binary. Now, we *could* go down the road of providing maven archetypes instead, so people can build their own wrapper pom out of our archetype. But I'm not sure if it's really worth going this way.
In addition, if we provide these wrappers I think we should open the next door and provide an obr as well :) So, I think either we go the full way (pom+bin+obr) or we leave the wrapper bundles to others and remove commons altogether. Personally, I'm fine with both alternatives. Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
