On 8/20/07, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hm, extending the eventadmin sounds wrong to me. Why can't you just > package your own bundle based on the eventadmin? Then you can just add > your own Activator... Unless I'm missing something?
On second thought, I guess I'm just unable to see the use case. Could you give an example of what you are trying to do that you need to extend the eventadmin for? > regards, > > Karl > > On 8/20/07, Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would like to extend the implementation of the event admin and add > > some stuff (for example by sub classing). These extensions are rather > > special and therefore I don't think it makes sense to commit them to the > > Felix project. > > > > But I'm now wondering how we could allow some extension hooks for such > > customizing? One possible solution would be to make the class name of > > the event admin impl configurable through a property, another one would > > be to provide explicit hooks for extensions. > > > > Are there perhaps better/easier solutions? > > > > Thanks > > Carsten > > -- > > Carsten Ziegeler > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > -- > Karl Pauls > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
