Carsten Ziegeler schrieb: > Karl Pauls wrote: >> On 8/20/07, Karl Pauls <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Hm, extending the eventadmin sounds wrong to me. Why can't you just >>> package your own bundle based on the eventadmin? Then you can just add >>> your own Activator... Unless I'm missing something? > Yes, I thought about this as well - but it comes with the cost of > duplicating the activator code - it's not that much but still not that > nice :) > >> On second thought, I guess I'm just unable to see the use case. Could >> you give an example of what you are trying to do that you need to >> extend the eventadmin for? > > Sure :) One idea is to add clustering possibilities which means that > events are send to other nodes in the cluster as well. > Ok, looking at the code again, I think we could change the Activator code a little bit and factor out the object creation in the start() method to separate method (like createEventAdminImpl(...)) - so I could easily provide my own activator which extends the existing one.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
