On 21/09/2007, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > No, there are no issues. I use 1.4.2 personally, but our goal is to be > 1.3 compatible. > > Can we set this in our pom file?
done - it was using a target of 1.4, I've dropped this down to 1.3 also note the following sub-projects currently use different settings: mishell 1.6 jmxintrospector 5 # should this be 1.5 ? ipojo/annotations 1.5 as they use new language features Additionally, we should start using the foundation execution environment > JAR from OSGi Alliance to make sure we don't use improper methods. Is > this something else we can set up in our pom? not sure, will look into this... -> richard > > Stefano Lenzi wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Is there any reason to produce 1.4 classes? > > > > I've tried to recompile the whole Felix bundles for JVM 1.3 and it > > worked perfectly. > > > > I think it would be nice to target the minimum JVM class version, in > > order to provide the best compatibility. What do you think? > > > > Ciao, > > Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi > > > > P.S.: I'm referring only to bytecode version not to classlibrary > > provided by the JRE. > -- Cheers, Stuart
