Richard S. Hall wrote: > Carsten Ziegeler wrote: >> Currently we have two +1 votes. >> >> To clarify the issue with the NOTICE file, the policy says: >> >> "The remainder of the NOTICE file is to be used for required third-party >> notices." >> >> This means it is not required to list all dependencies here and our >> release is safe. >> > > It is not clear to me that this means we are not required to list > third-party copyrights, which is at issue here. > > Regardless, we will include copyrights notices here in the future to > give credit where credit is due. > > As I said, it doesn't seem like a big issue, but I was kind of hoping to > have someone with a little more insight than me agree before giving it a > +1. > > I am not sure that your quote above is sufficient, especially since it > is not even clear from where it comes. > Yes, my fault. It's from the release faq: http://apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#notice
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
