On 04/01/2008, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/> > > > > ASF is all about Open *Source*. Releases are source releases and binary > > releases are just convenience to the general public. The source release > > is > > required, the binary ones are optional from ASF's PoV. > > > then the parent Felix pom seriously needs changing, as it doesn't attach > either the source* or javadoc artifacts to the release - if you look at > all the > Felix releases to date on http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/felix > _none_ of them have either source or javadoc artifacts. > > (* the source is tagged in subversion as part of the release, but not > packaged) > > so is it mandatory that source jars appear alongside on the Maven repo? >
just to make clear, I prefer having the source jars attached: but having looked at all the other releases from Felix just assumed the local policy was to only upload the binary artifact... Cheers > > -- > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > > > > > -- > Cheers, Stuart -- Cheers, Stuart
