On 04/01/2008, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/01/2008, Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Thursday 03 January 2008 23:14, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > > > I've compiled the 1.0.0 release candidate and put it up here: > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~mcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/<http://people.apache.org/%7Emcculls/releases/felix/org.osgi.service.obr/> > > > > ASF is all about Open *Source*. Releases are source releases and binary > > releases are just convenience to the general public. The source release > > is > > required, the binary ones are optional from ASF's PoV. > > > I've uploaded signed tar.gz's and zip's of the source based on the tagged > release >
BTW, shouldn't http://felix.apache.org/site/downloads.cgi show the source downloads? When I view it with firefox I don't see any download links - but I eventually found them over at http://apache.leakage.org/felix (this is what originally confused me about whether the tagged release was enough) Cheers > > -- > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > > > I live here; http://tinyurl.com/2qq9er > > I work here; http://tinyurl.com/2ymelc > > I relax here; http://tinyurl.com/2cgsug > > > > > > -- > Cheers, Stuart -- Cheers, Stuart
