Karl Pauls wrote:
Stuart,
it looks to me like we have a dependency on stuff from plexus which is
under MIT. This should be in the NOTICE no? Not a showstopper IMO but
anyways... Somebody else already mentioned that the copyright date in
the NOTICE needs updating too.
As far as I understand this (and there is a recent thread on legal about
this as well), we only have to mention stuff in the notice file if it
gets distributed in the release *directly*. So as long as the
corresponding jar files are not included in the archive, they don't have
to be mentioned in the notice.
However, these things *can* be mentioned for convenience.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
