[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567238#action_12567238
]
Stefano Lenzi commented on FELIX-486:
-------------------------------------
> Did we make a decision on what our byte code level should be? I thought that
> we just agreed that our code should compile on JDK 1.3, which does > not
> necessarily mean that we target 1.3 byte code.
As long the revision 577974 we are compiling all the bundle for JRE 1.3 by
default (It means at least felix pom-1.0.1), but we are currently using JDK 1.4
source by default. Finally, at the moment I don't know how many bundles are
using only JRE 1.3 classes
>Of course, I don't really have a problem with it either. I guess we have to
>decide if that is what we want to do.
I don't know if compiling for JRE 1.4 bytecode provides any benefit. I will
vote for JRE 1.3 bytecode :)
>However, does this really warrant a new release? If so, we would use "even"
>point numbers.
I don't know if we can overwrite the package already release. What do you mean
with "even" point numbers?
> Felix release conting mixed bytecode: 1.3 and 1.4, we should compile all as
> 1.3
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FELIX-486
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-486
> Project: Felix
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.0.3
> Reporter: Stefano Lenzi
> Priority: Minor
>
> I found out that the following released project:
> - shell-1.0.0
> - javax.servlet-1.0.0
> - org.osgi.core-1.0.0
> - shell.tui-1.0.0
> which are used by the felix-1.0.3 release are compiled for JRE 1.4, so we
> ended up with a felix released which is partially compiled for JRE 1.4 and
> for JRE 1.3.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
