On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 2:27 AM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Richard S. Hall <[email protected]> > wrote: > > But I wouldn't be happy if a TLP was pursued only because > > there is this perception that Felix subprojects are for Felix only. That > > just perpetuates people's ignorance. > > This was not the reason for my suggestion, and is to me an important > but separate issue. > > My reasons for suggesting a TLP; > > - Already seems to have more community involvement than we require. > > - Multiple projects at the ASF are signaling interest to build on top of > it. > > - OSGi is becoming a household technology, and Felix needs to address > the 'umbrella' concerns sooner or later. TLP would avoid adding to > that label. > Felix is in no danger of becoming a jakarta. Also if they were ready to do a TLP they would have gone that route instead of proposing it here as a subproject. If the future holds something else then we'll find out in time. This is IMHO a moot point to discuss or worry about. When/if the time is right the move will be made. For now we're just happy good things are happening ... let's roll with that. Regards, Alex
