Yeah, i've seen this one, and I was thinking of hacking gogo to allow those. I don't think it should be treated as a real separator anyway.
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:21, David Savage<[email protected]> wrote: > Just to point out, one other minor difference between RFC 132 and > other command handlers...having made the conversion ourselves in Posh > [1] The TCL implementation treats command names as method names so > they need to be valid java names - so characters like "-" are not > allowed. In our case command with names such as "do-this" had to > become "do_this" > > Possibly this is a limitation of the current impl vs a requirement of the > spec? > > But I thought I'd warn you... > > Regards, > > Dave > > [1] > http://www.paremus.com/resources/_resources_presentations_pdf/Paremus_-_Posh_-_an_OSGi_shell_-_RFC132_in_action.html > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:56 AM, Guillaume Nodet<[email protected]> wrote: >> Well, if we consider switching, it *is* the right moment, as Karaf has >> not done any release yet. >> I'd rather do that before the first release than after. >> >> That said, the commands will be the same as we would just port the >> existing karaf commands for gshell to gogo, which currently has a very >> minimal impact (change the base class and the package for annotations, >> that's mostly it). >> From a syntax point of view, the difference now is that they would >> look like osgi:list instead of osgi/list, but I'm quite sure I can >> hack gogo to allow the customization of the separator. >> I don't see any technical problems in porting the completers (which >> are really helpful). >> >> So in short, if I can configure gogo to use '/' instead of ':' as a >> separator, it should be mostly transparent for end users. People >> having written commands would need to migrate though (but as I said, >> it's easy to do). >> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 10:16, Charles Moulliard<[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi guillaume, >>> >>> From a technical point of view, this seems very interesting but is it the >>> right moment to do this migration regarding to client(s) using Apache >>> ServiceMix4, ... ? This will impact existing documents, tutorials, ... >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Charles Moulliard >>> Senior Enterprise Architect >>> Apache Camel Committer >>> >>> ***************************** >>> blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I've been considering swithing karaf shell from Geronimo Gshell to Felix >>>> Gogo. >>>> The main reasons are: >>>> * Gogo is/will implement OSGi RFC 0142 to standardize the shell >>>> (it's not yet a spec, but should be in the future) >>>> * Gogo should be able to be used at launch time to run the framework >>>> * Gogo shell syntax is more powerfull, in addition to pipes, it >>>> supports closures, loops, if / then / else ... >>>> * lightweight: < 100 ko vs > 1 Mo for gshell >>>> >>>> The drawbacks are: >>>> * yet another change in the syntax (we've already changed it when >>>> between 1.0.0 and 1.1.0) >>>> * some more work is needed as we're currently missing completors, >>>> history, banner >>>> >>>> Feedback welcome >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>> ------------------------ >>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>> ------------------------ >>>> Open Source SOA >>>> http://fusesource.com >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Paremus Limited. Registered in England. Registration No. 4181472 > > Registered Office: 22-24 Broad Street, Wokingham, Berks RG40 1BA > > Postal Address: 107-111 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AB > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person(s) or > entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or > privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or > other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this > information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient > is prohibited. > > If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete > the material from any computer. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
