Yeah, I definitely would not like switch if we're not feature equivalent (or mostly).
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 15:42, janstey<[email protected]> wrote: > > Sounds like a lot of wins there for this move but I'm a bit worried about not > having history or tab completion right away. Before those features made it > into the ServiceMix Kernel, I found it VERY frustrating to use. Maybe they > should be added before Karaf 1.0 is released? > > Cheers, > Jon > > http://janstey.blogspot.com/ > > > gnodet wrote: >> >> I've been considering swithing karaf shell from Geronimo Gshell to Felix >> Gogo. >> The main reasons are: >> * Gogo is/will implement OSGi RFC 0142 to standardize the shell >> (it's not yet a spec, but should be in the future) >> * Gogo should be able to be used at launch time to run the framework >> * Gogo shell syntax is more powerfull, in addition to pipes, it >> supports closures, loops, if / then / else ... >> * lightweight: < 100 ko vs > 1 Mo for gshell >> >> The drawbacks are: >> * yet another change in the syntax (we've already changed it when >> between 1.0.0 and 1.1.0) >> * some more work is needed as we're currently missing completors, >> history, banner >> >> Feedback welcome >> > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/-karaf--Switching-from-gshell-to-gogo-tp24301702p24306951.html > Sent from the Apache Felix - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
