On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Sten,
>
> Looks bascially good (files as appropriate have the license headers, MD5
> checksum matches).
>
> Just two remarks:
>
>  * The pom.xml should also have the license headers
>   (this can probably be fixed when we import into SVN)
>
>  * there is a runner folder containing scripts and the
>   pax runner library.
>   This should probably not be included, right ?
>   (again, I think we can start the process and just omit
>   this directory when importing into SVN)


Yes, just omit the runner folder. That was a mistake. Was only using that to
make quick tests.


>
> As part of the IP-process we also need an ICLA of you, Sten, on file. I
> see there is one for Sten Roger Sanvik with email s...@xbm.com. Am I
> correct to assume, that this is your ICLA ?


Yes, but the email is wrong. It's s...@x3m.com. And the name Sten Roger
Sandvik :-) Do I need another one?


> Thanks again for your submission, I will now start the process of
> getting this into Felix SVN.
>
> Regards
> Felix
>
>
> Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb:
> > Attached the source in the jira task (
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456). Not sure on what
> format
> > that the attachement should be, but created a tar.gz file. Attached a md5
> > checksum for the package.
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik <s...@x3m.com> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> Rob Walker schrieb:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> The next steps are IIRC the following:
> >>>>
> >>>>   * Sten packages the source and attaches the package to
> >>>>     the issue and publishes a package checksum.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright notices from
> the
> >>> files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix Java file).
> Package
> >>> renaming is not necessary at this point.
> >>>
> >> Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create a tarball
> and
> >> add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting committer rights
> so
> >> that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled in a seperate
> vote?
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>    * We vote on accepting this submission
> >>>>   * We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form,
> >>>>     sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h)
> >>>>   * Add the code into the SVN
> >>>>
> >>>> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process.
> >>>>
> >>>> Any volunteers (I could do it) ?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I am happy to have you do it. :-)
> >>>
> >>> Of course, I can help if needed.
> >>>
> >>> -> richard
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>  Regards
> >>>> Felix
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach and
> code
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" compatibility
> >>>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would be
> >>>>> wrong and the current one right, just whether thenew version breaks
> >>>>> anything present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure it'll
> >>>>> either be fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the
> >>>>> current service - so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to be
> >>>>> able to advise other Felix guys of anything that might differ and
> need
> >>>>> application changes.  I'm happy to make time to look at this next
> week.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also need
> to
> >>>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us pretty
> >>>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller
> >>>>> solution
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -- Rob
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >
>

Reply via email to