Hi Sten, Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: > Ah, ok. Actually my employer is paying for my involvement in projects, but > not the work done on this particular piece. Maybe I need to fax in a > Corporate CLA then?
Hmm, ok. Maybe it would be better then -- it certainly does not hurt. Regards Felix > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: >>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 8/28/09 16:30, Felix Meschberger wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Sten, >>>>> >>>>> Looks bascially good (files as appropriate have the license headers, >> MD5 >>>>> checksum matches). >>>>> >>>>> Just two remarks: >>>>> >>>>> * The pom.xml should also have the license headers >>>>> (this can probably be fixed when we import into SVN) >>>>> >>>>> * there is a runner folder containing scripts and the >>>>> pax runner library. >>>>> This should probably not be included, right ? >>>>> (again, I think we can start the process and just omit >>>>> this directory when importing into SVN) >>>>> >>>>> As part of the IP-process we also need an ICLA of you, Sten, on file. I >>>>> see there is one for Sten Roger Sanvik with email s...@xbm.com. Am I >>>>> correct to assume, that this is your ICLA ? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks again for your submission, I will now start the process of >>>>> getting this into Felix SVN. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Which will require Sten to fill out a Software Grant, which may need to >>>> come from his employer if it is actually the employer who is >> contributing >>>> the code. >>> >>> No, it does not need to be from my employer. Been coding this in my spare >>> time. It has been used at Enonic (my current workplace) in form of some >>> binaries. So a grant from Enonic is not neccessary. But will be happy to >>> provide one if you really need it. >> A Corporate CLA is only required if your employer pays your for working >> on Apache projects. >> >> But what we would probably need to be good for IP clearance is a >> software grant [1]. You may fax it to the same number as the ICLA. Thanks. >> >> >> Regards >> Felix >> >> [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt >> >>> >>>> -> richard >>>> >>>> >>>> Regards >>>>> Felix >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sten Roger Sandvik schrieb: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Attached the source in the jira task ( >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456). Not sure on what >>>>>> format >>>>>> that the attachement should be, but created a tar.gz file. Attached a >> md5 >>>>>> checksum for the package. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik<s...@x3m.com> >> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Richard S. Hall< >> he...@ungoverned.org >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 8/28/09 4:36, Felix Meschberger wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Rob Walker schrieb: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What do we need to do make this happen guys? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The next steps are IIRC the following: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * Sten packages the source and attaches the package to >>>>>>>>> the issue and publishes a package checksum. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will add to this, removes any existing header/copyright notices >> from >>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> files and adds the standard Apache header (see any Felix Java file). >>>>>>>> Package >>>>>>>> renaming is not necessary at this point. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Have added apache (2.0) on top of all files. Will now create a >> tarball >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> add it to the JIRA task. I'm also interested in getting committer >> rights >>>>>>> so >>>>>>> that I can still maintain the code. Will that be handled in a >> seperate >>>>>>> vote? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> * We vote on accepting this submission >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> * We do the IP-clearance (filling out a form, >>>>>>>>> sending a mail to incubator@ and wait for 72h) >>>>>>>>> * Add the code into the SVN >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think, we also need someone from the PMC to drive this process. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any volunteers (I could do it) ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I am happy to have you do it. :-) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Of course, I can help if needed. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -> richard >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Felix >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Sten - sounds like you've done a great job, kudos. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Felix/Marcel - sounds like you guys are happy with the approach >> and >>>>>>>>>> code >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> From our side, we can certainly run some "real world" >> compatibility >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> tests - which isn't to say in fact that Sten's new service would >> be >>>>>>>>>> wrong and the current one right, just whether thenew version >> breaks >>>>>>>>>> anything present in the exisiting service. If it does, I'm sure >> it'll >>>>>>>>>> either be fixable, or something that's actually not correct in the >>>>>>>>>> current service - so not a major issue. It'll be useful though to >> be >>>>>>>>>> able to advise other Felix guys of anything that might differ and >>>>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>>> application changes. I'm happy to make time to look at this next >>>>>>>>>> week. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> After that - do we just call a vote? I'm guessing Sten, we also >> need >>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>> propose you as a committter for maintenance? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Great progress though - the current Http service has served us >> pretty >>>>>>>>>> well, but it's always been on the list to have cleaner and fuller >>>>>>>>>> solution >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- Rob >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >
