Sounds good. Do you plan to work on that soon ? On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 13:22, Derek Baum<[email protected]> wrote: > yep 0.2 sounds like a good idea. > > I'd like to fix: > > FELIX-1526: rename <> operators to () > > before the 0.2 release, as this will break any existing scripts that use <>. > > Derek > > > > 2009/9/1 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]>: >> I'd like to release a first version of Gogo. >> However, given the RFC is bound to change and that we might introduce >> other changes that will break the syntax, I wonder if we should use a >> 0.2.0 version instead of 1.0.0. >> In addition, we will release the org.osgi.service.command package >> which is not official, so I think keeping a version < 1.0.0 makes >> sense until a spec is released for that. >> Thoughts ? >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> >
-- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
