Ok, let me know when the request has been created (so that I can try to push it).
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:03, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote: > 2009/9/2 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > > > Why is there a need to wait for bnd to be in central given that the > source > > code is included in the bundle plugin project ? > > Is that just temporary ? > > > yes - Peter has his own Maven repo for Bnd, but unfortunately this is not > sync'd to central > (I've suggested he sets up sync'ing a number of times, but this is not high > on his todo list) > > we don't use Peter's repository in the bundleplugin pom.xml because it's > not > good practice > (the additional repository would then get hit for all maven artifacts, not > just the bnd groupId) > > previously I've got Carlos to upload the artifact manually, but this gets > very tiresome during > development which is why I decided to just put a copy of the source there > at > the moment > > if we released the plugin with this source then you wouldn't be able to > override the bnd > version during the build (because there's no dependency) and it makes > things > messy > > > > Also did anyone asked for the new version to be > > put in central already ? > > > > I was just about to - there's been a few regressions in the recent builds, > but Peter has > just blessed 0.0.356 as a good build. Bear in mind that a manual upload to > central can > take a while, depending who's available to do the upload (which is why sync > is better). > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 10:36, Stuart McCulloch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > 2009/9/2 Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > > > > > > > I've tried to release gogo this morning and after fixing a few > things, > > > i've > > > > badly hit FELIX-1262 which is actually fixed in the latest snapshot > of > > > the > > > > maven bundle plugin. > > > > Is this plugin in a state to be released now ? > > > > > > > > > > no it's not in a state to be released - for one we want to move to the > > > latest bndlib (and first we need that available on central) > > > > > > > > > > I can try to release it unless somebody is willing to do it. What > > would > > > be > > > > the version to use ? 2.0.1, 2.0.2 ? Not sure to have a good > > > understanding > > > > of the version scheme with odd/even numbers for minor releases. > > > > > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 08:25, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'd like to release a first version of Gogo. > > > > > However, given the RFC is bound to change and that we might > introduce > > > > > other changes that will break the syntax, I wonder if we should use > a > > > > > 0.2.0 version instead of 1.0.0. > > > > > In addition, we will release the org.osgi.service.command package > > > > > which is not official, so I think keeping a version < 1.0.0 makes > > > > > sense until a spec is released for that. > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > > ------------------------ > > > > > Open Source SOA > > > > > http://fusesource.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Cheers, > > > > Guillaume Nodet > > > > ------------------------ > > > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > > > ------------------------ > > > > Open Source SOA > > > > http://fusesource.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, Stuart > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > ------------------------ > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > ------------------------ > > Open Source SOA > > http://fusesource.com > > > > > > -- > Cheers, Stuart > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
