To be cear: new http.jetty service should be a 100% dropin replacement for the old http.jetty service. I think it's pretty close right now since the actual implementation of new http.jetty bundle is almost the same code as the old one.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik <[email protected]> wrote: > The current http.jetty implementation is almost identical to the new > http/jetty implementation. So in my opinion it's not neccesarry to keep > implementing on the old one, unless it's some really good points in doing > so. So the folder could then be http (just use another version than > http.jetty). > > Regards, > Sten Roger > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Felix Meschberger <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> The IP Clearance vote period will soon end and we will be able to import >> the HttpService contribution by Sten Roger Sandvik [1]. >> >> Looking at the current folders in the Felix trunk, I consider importing >> the modules into a httpservice folder (we already have a http.jetty >> project, which is the Jetty Embedding HttpService implementation). >> >> WDYT ? >> >> Regards >> Felix >> >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456 >> > >
