In that case we can just replace the current impl (keeping the name),
but call it version 2.0.0, no?
-> richard
On 9/10/09 15:19, Sten Roger Sandvik wrote:
To be cear: new http.jetty service should be a 100% dropin replacement for
the old http.jetty service. I think it's pretty close right now since the
actual implementation of new http.jetty bundle is almost the same code as
the old one.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Sten Roger Sandvik<[email protected]> wrote:
The current http.jetty implementation is almost identical to the new
http/jetty implementation. So in my opinion it's not neccesarry to keep
implementing on the old one, unless it's some really good points in doing
so. So the folder could then be http (just use another version than
http.jetty).
Regards,
Sten Roger
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Felix Meschberger<[email protected]>wrote:
Hi all,
The IP Clearance vote period will soon end and we will be able to import
the HttpService contribution by Sten Roger Sandvik [1].
Looking at the current folders in the Felix trunk, I consider importing
the modules into a httpservice folder (we already have a http.jetty
project, which is the Jetty Embedding HttpService implementation).
WDYT ?
Regards
Felix
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1456
