The offer still stands :) I can try to get it refactored next week. If I don't have it ready in time, we can always put it in a later release...
David 2009/10/16 Eoghan Glynn <eogl...@gmail.com> > It would be quite useful to have the AdminServiceMBean.getInstances() > operation exposed, as it would allow for remote probing that a particular > instance has been successfully started. I'm thinking of a scenario where > this probe is done programmatically via JMX/RMI as opposed to manually > using > some tooling like jconsole. We have an application where we create > instances > remotely in order to run some tests, hence the need to probe for the > readiness of each new instance. > > Cheers, > Eoghan > > 2009/10/16 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > > > However, if we have time to refactor it very soon, i would certainly > > have no problem to include it in 1.0.2. > > What I meant is that I'd rather avoid exposing an mbean which is bound > > to be refactored in the near future. > > > > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:30, David Bosschaert > > <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Okidoki, I'll leave that one for now. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > David > > > > > > 2009/10/15 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > > > > > >> Right, I think I've missed that one while refactoring the JMX layer > > >> for the features service. > > >> Unless there is a real need for that now, I would defer to 1.2.0 and > > >> refactor it in a more coarse grained service, the same way we did for > > >> the FeaturesServiceMBean, so that we'd have a getInstances() method > > >> that would return a TabularData containing all the informations > > >> available for a give instance (name, port and state for now). We > > >> could leave the other methods unchanged. > > >> > > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 18:09, David Bosschaert > > >> <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> > Hi all, > > >> > > > >> > While looking at FELIX-1655, I noticed that there is actually an > > >> > AdminServiceMBean in the code, but it doesn't seem to be registered > > with > > >> the > > >> > MBean Server. Is this done deliberately or is this an oversight or > am > > I > > >> > missing it? > > >> > > > >> > I think having this controllable through JMX would be useful - I'd > be > > >> happy > > >> > to try an enable this functionality... > > >> > > > >> > Cheers, > > >> > > > >> > David > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Cheers, > > >> Guillaume Nodet > > >> ------------------------ > > >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > >> ------------------------ > > >> Open Source SOA > > >> http://fusesource.com > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > Guillaume Nodet > > ------------------------ > > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > > ------------------------ > > Open Source SOA > > http://fusesource.com > > >
