I've created FELIX-1766 for this. 2009/10/16 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com>
> Sounds good! > > On Friday, October 16, 2009, David Bosschaert > <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The offer still stands :) I can try to get it refactored next week. If I > > don't have it ready in time, we can always put it in a later release... > > > > David > > > > 2009/10/16 Eoghan Glynn <eogl...@gmail.com> > > > >> It would be quite useful to have the AdminServiceMBean.getInstances() > >> operation exposed, as it would allow for remote probing that a > particular > >> instance has been successfully started. I'm thinking of a scenario where > >> this probe is done programmatically via JMX/RMI as opposed to manually > >> using > >> some tooling like jconsole. We have an application where we create > >> instances > >> remotely in order to run some tests, hence the need to probe for the > >> readiness of each new instance. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Eoghan > >> > >> 2009/10/16 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > However, if we have time to refactor it very soon, i would certainly > >> > have no problem to include it in 1.0.2. > >> > What I meant is that I'd rather avoid exposing an mbean which is bound > >> > to be refactored in the near future. > >> > > >> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:30, David Bosschaert > >> > <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > Okidoki, I'll leave that one for now. > >> > > > >> > > Cheers, > >> > > > >> > > David > >> > > > >> > > 2009/10/15 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > >> > > > >> > >> Right, I think I've missed that one while refactoring the JMX layer > >> > >> for the features service. > >> > >> Unless there is a real need for that now, I would defer to 1.2.0 > and > >> > >> refactor it in a more coarse grained service, the same way we did > for > >> > >> the FeaturesServiceMBean, so that we'd have a getInstances() method > >> > >> that would return a TabularData containing all the informations > >> > >> available for a give instance (name, port and state for now). We > >> > >> could leave the other methods unchanged. > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 18:09, David Bosschaert > >> > >> <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi all, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > While looking at FELIX-1655, I noticed that there is actually an > >> > >> > AdminServiceMBean in the code, but it doesn't seem to be > registered > >> > with > >> > >> the > >> > >> > MBean Server. Is this done deliberately or is this an oversight > or > >> am > >> > I > >> > >> > missing it? > >> > >> > > >> > >> > I think having this controllable through JMX would be useful - > I'd > >> be > >> > >> happy > >> > >> > to try an enable this functionality... > >> > >> > > >> > >> > Cheers, > >> > >> > > >> > >> > David > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Guillaume Nodet > >> > >> ------------------------ > >> > >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >> > >> ------------------------ > >> > >> Open Source SOA > >> > >> http://fusesource.com > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Cheers, > >> > Guillaume Nodet > >> > ------------------------ > >> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > >> > ------------------------ > >> > Open Source SOA > >> > http://fusesource.com > >> > > >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
