Yeah, i was thinking along the same way. People may just want to inline the classes they need at the end, but at least they would be maintained at single location and be easy to find.
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 15:27, Richard S. Hall <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/5/10 9:06, Guillaume Nodet wrote: >> >> I think there are a number of utility classes that tend to spread around. >> I'm thinking about: >> * version range >> * fuzzy version matching (i.e. something -> correct osgi version) >> and maybe more. >> >> What would you guys think about creating a util bundle where all those >> utility classes would be put instead of duplicating them all around ? >> > > We discussed this topic before, but no one ever did anything about it. In > general, I think it makes some sense. We might find some issues in practice, > such as if it becomes too large or not cohesive...but even then it would > still be possible to use it as a centralized utility bundle and pull stuff > into other bundles from it using BND. > > -> richard > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
